Fake news in the digital age
Understanding Cebuano voters’ acceptance and use of misinformation during elections
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19491981 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Junas Dungog Flores (Cebu Technological University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Volumen | 8 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-05-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpos.2026.1779500 |
| OpenAlex | W7162080791 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 56 |
The spread of misinformation on social media presents significant challenges to democratic processes, particularly during electoral periods in highly mediated political environments. While previous studies have examined demographic and cultural influences on misinformation susceptibility, localized evidence from Southeast Asian electoral contexts remains limited. This study examines the acceptance and use of fake news on social media among Cebuano voters in Metro Cebu, Philippines, focusing on demographic characteristics, cultural orientation, perceived comprehensibility of political information, and social media platform use. A quantitative research design was employed, using a structured survey instrument on fake news acceptance, contextualized for the Philippine electoral setting. Data were collected from 163 registered voters and analyzed using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results show that Facebook is the primary source of election-related information, indicating a platform-centered political information environment. Respondents reported moderate levels of perceived comprehensibility, neutral levels of fake news acceptance, and moderate levels of fake news use, suggesting conditional acceptance and selective engagement. Age and voter tenure significantly influenced acceptance and use of fake news, while other demographic variables showed no significant differences. The findings indicate that misinformation engagement is shaped by cognitive processing, platform environments, and political experience
Democracy · Descriptive statistics · General Social Survey · Misinformation · Politics · Social media · Survey data collection · E-Government and Public Services · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics
Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda
Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior
The Psychology of Fake News
Twenty Years of Digital Media Effects on Civic and Political Participation
Why people share misinformation on social media? An integration of affordance and flow theories
Who shares misinformation on social media? A meta-analysis of individual traits related to misinformation sharing
The pursuit of online misinformation literacy
Social media networks, fake news, and polarization
Aging in an Era of Fake News
Inoculating Against Fake News About Covid-19
Defining “Fake News”
The Impact of Affect on the Perception of Fake News on Social Media
Information Pandemic
Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media
Misinformation on social platforms
Social media and disinformation for candidates
Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media
Fake news
Facts are hard to come by
Using social and behavioural science to support Covid-19 pandemic response
Motivations behind misinformation engagement
Scrollability
Citizens Versus the Internet
Resilience to Online Disinformation
Facts and Myths about Misperceptions
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
Sustaining Exposure to Fact-Checks
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |