Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives

Qualitative survey findings

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19508063
AutoresRachel Hemphill (0000-0002-1826-080X, Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute Washington DC USA, autor de correspondencia), Laura P Forsythe (0000-0003-2280-992X, Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute Washington DC USA), Andrea Heckert (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute), Andrea L Heckert (Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute Washington DC USA), Andrew Amolegbe (American Institutes for Research Chapel Hill NC USA), Maureen Maurer (0000-0001-6668-7560, American Institutes for Research Chapel Hill NC USA), Kristin L Carman (Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute Washington DC USA), Rikki Mangrum (0000-0001-6231-5890, American Institutes for Research Chapel Hill NC USA), Lisa Stewart (0000-0001-5423-8901, Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute Washington DC USA), Ninma Fearon (Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute Washington DC USA), Laura Esmail (0000-0003-3684-614X, Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute Washington DC USA)
Año2020
Volumen23
Número2
Páginas328-336
Fecha de publicación2020-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.12979
PMID31800154
OpenAlexW2994238675
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas19

BACKGROUND: US research organizations increasingly are supporting patient and stakeholder engagement in health research with a goal of producing more useful, relevant and patient-centered evidence better aligned with real-world clinical needs. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) engages patients, family caregivers and other health-care stakeholders, including clinicians, payers and policymakers, as active partners in prioritizing, designing, conducting and disseminating research as a key strategy to produce useful evidence for health-care decision making. OBJECTIVE: To inform effective engagement practices and policies, we sought to understand what motivates patients and caregivers to engage as partners on PCORI-funded research projects and how such engagement changed their lives. METHODS: We conducted thematic analysis of open-ended survey responses from 255 patients, family caregivers and individuals from advocacy and community-based organizations who engaged as partners on 139 PCORI-funded research projects focusing on a range of health conditions. RESULTS: Partners' motivations for engaging in research were oriented primarily towards benefiting others, including a desire to improve patients' lives and to support effective health-care interventions. In addition to feeling they made a positive difference, many partners reported direct benefits from engagement, such as new relationships and improved health habits. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: By identifying patient and caregiver motivations for engaging in research partnerships and what they get out of the experience, our study may help research teams and organizations attract partners and foster more satisfying and sustainable partnerships. Our findings also add to evidence that engagement benefits the people involved as partners, strengthening the case for more widespread engagement

Alternative medicine · Community engagement · Feeling · Health care · Medical education · Outcomes research · Political science · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Thematic analysis · Diabetes Management and Education · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Moving from Principle to Practice

    Open Access•Kendra L Smith, Elliot K Main et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2024

  • Revisiting the hospital-issued gown in hospitalizations from a locus of control and patient-centered care perspectives

    Open Access•Gillie Gabay, Hana Ornoy•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • ‘No‐one has listened to anything I’ve got to say before’

    Open Access•Robert Mullins, Bridget E Kelly et al.•Health Expectations•2021

  • Patient perspectives on the need for implanted device information

    Open Access•Natalia Wilson, Amanda J Reich et al.•Health Expectations•2021

  • The Importance of Lived Experience

    Open Access•Heather Mah, Ruth Dobson et al.•Health Expectations•2025

  • Attitudes on breast feeding among persons with HIV who have given birth and their perceptions of coercion during counseling on safe infant feeding practices

    Gweneth B Lazenby, Beth Sundstrom et al.•AIDS Care•2023

  • Reimagining Research With Black Communities

    Open Access•Bukola Salami, Dominic A Alaazi et al.•Qualitative Inquiry•2025

  • A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities

    Open Access•Jo Brett, Sophie Staniszewska et al.•The Patient - Patient-Centered…•2014

  • Patient engagement in research

    Open Access•Juan Pablo Domecq, Gabriela Prutsky et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2014

  • What The Evidence Shows About Patient Activation

    Judith H Hibbard, Jessica Greene•Health Affairs•2013

  • A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

    Open Access•Thomas W Concannon, Melissa Fuster et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2014

  • Patient And Family Engagement

    Kristin L Carman, Pam Dardess et al.•Health Affairs•2013

  • Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research

    Open Access•Jo Brett, Sophie Staniszewska et al.•Health Expectations•2014

  • Understanding the motivations of patients

    Open Access•Tamara L McCarron, Thomas Noseworthy et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • How and why should we engage parents as co‐researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices

    Open Access•Shuoqi Shen, Krissy A R Doyle‐Thomas et al.•Health Expectations•2017

  • Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again

    Open Access•Laura Forsythe, Laura P Forsythe et al.•Quality of Life Research•2017

  • Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute

    Open Access•Lori Frank, Laura Forsythe et al.•Quality of Life Research•2015

Obras citantes distintas7
Citas por año1,4
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2025 (5)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae