‘It’s the best of two evils’
A study of patients’ perceived information needs about oral steroids for asthma
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19508676 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Fiona A Stevenson (0000-0003-2139-2309, University of Derby), Gwen Wallace (University of Derby), Peter Rivers (0000-0001-9409-3137, University of Derby), David Gerrett (University of Derby) |
| Año | 1999 |
| Volumen | 2 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 185-194 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1999-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00055.x |
| PMID | 11281895 |
| OpenAlex | W2153475728 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 7 |
| Referencias citadas | 18 |
Objectives To explore the sources of patients’ knowledge about the potential side‐effects of oral steroids prescribed to treat asthma. Methods Seventeen in‐depth interviews were conducted with patients taking prescribed oral steroid medication (prednisolone) for asthma. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and the data organized according to common themes. Results All the respondents acknowledged they had no choice but to take oral steroids but they wanted to be informed about the potential side‐effects. Respondents reported that they had not received sufficient information about side‐effects from their general practitioner (GP). Information was sought from both medical sources (pharmacists and asthma nurses) and non‐medical sources (friends and family, self‐help groups and the media) to supplement their knowledge. The conclusions drawn about the risks of taking oral steroids were also influenced by respondents’ existing beliefs. Conclusions Respondents drew upon information about oral steroids from a variety of professional and lay sources. The findings add weight to calls for doctors and patients to share their respective knowledge in consultations. Developing an understanding of the views of GPs about the provision of information about side‐effects would help to identify any perceived barriers to a more open exchange of information in the consultation
Asthma · Family medicine · Medical information · Patient education · Asthma and respiratory diseases · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Internal Medicine
Comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online information
A qualitative study of the impact of severe asthma and its treatment showing that treatment burden is neglected in existing asthma assessment scales
Predictors of complementary therapy use among asthma patients
Expectations of patients and parents of children with asthma regarding access to complementary therapy information and services via the NHS
The role and value of written information for patients about individual medicines
Ensuring Quality Information for Patients
The relationship between medicine and the public
Analyzing Qualitative Data
The informative process in private medical consultations
The informative process in private medical consultations
Health promotion in primary care
Medication, chronic illness and identity
Alternative or additional medicine? An exploratory study in general practice
The meaning of medications
How people get into mental health services
The experience of asthma
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,32 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2004 - 2015 (12) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |