Racial differences in laboratory testing as a potential mechanism for bias in AI

AI models are often trained using available laboratory test results. Racial differences in laboratory testing may bias AI models for clinical decision support, amplifying existing inequities. This study aims to measure the extent of racial differences in laboratory testing in adult emergency department (ED) visits. We conducted a retrospective 1:1 exact-matched cohort study of Black and White adult patients seen in the ED, matching on age, biological sex, chief complaint, and ED triage score, using ED visits at two U.S. teaching hospitals: Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI (U-M, 2015–2022), and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (BIDMC, 2011–2019). Post-matching, White patients had significantly higher testing rates than Black patients for complete blood count (BIDMC difference: 1.7%, 95% CI: 1.1% to 2.4%, U-M difference: 2.0%, 95% CI: 1.6% to 2.5%), metabolic panel (BIDMC: 1.5%, 95% CI: 0.9% to 2.1%, U-M: 1.9%, 95% CI: 1.4% to 2.4%), and blood culture (BIDMC: 0.9%, 95% CI: 0.5% to 1.2%, U-M: 0.7%, 95% CI: 0.4% to 1.1%). Black patients had significantly higher testing rates for troponin than White patients (BIDMC: -2.1%, 95% CI: -2.6% to -1.6%, U-M: -2.2%, 95% CI: -2.7% to -1.8%). The observed racial testing differences may impact AI models trained using available laboratory results. The findings also motivate further study of how such differences arise and how to mitigate potential impacts on AI models

Cohort · Cohort study · Emergency department · Propensity score matching · Psychiatry · Retrospective cohort study · Triage · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes · Medicine · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine

• Diversity and Representation in Cardiovascular Research

  Open Access•Simran Grewal, James E Wildish et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  Añadir item

• Causality

  Open Access•Judea Pearl•Causality•2009

  Añadir item

• Multiple Comparisons among Means

  Olive Jean Dunn•Journal of the American…•1961

  Añadir item

• The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)

  Mervyn Singer, Clifford S Deutschman et al.•JAMA•2016

  Añadir item

• On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other

  Open Access•H B Mann, Douglas R Whitney•The Annals of Mathematical…•1947

  Añadir item

• X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling

  Karl Pearson•The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin…•1900

  Añadir item

• Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations

  Open Access•Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers et al.•Science•2019

  Añadir item

• Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching

  Open Access•Gary King, Richard Nielsen et al.•Political Analysis•2019

  Añadir item