Assessing the availability and scope of routine data on post-pregnancy family planning
A cross-sectional review of registers and reporting tools in 18 low- and middle-income countries
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19592227 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Deborah Sitrin (0000-0002-6589-6464, autor de correspondencia), Aurélie Brunie (0000-0002-9515-1420, Family Health International 360, autor de correspondencia), Rhonda Rosenberg (0000-0003-2183-3098, Avenir Health, autor de correspondencia), Lucy Wilson (0000-0002-0078-5499), Lucy E Wilson (0000-0003-0092-1750, Health Outcomes Solutions (United States), autor de correspondencia), Elena Lebetkin (0000-0002-8529-1286, Family Health International 360, autor de correspondencia), Rogers Kagimu (0009-0007-9497-5413, Ministry of Health, autor de correspondencia), Fredrick Makumbi (0000-0002-6460-7325, Makerere University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Editores | Julia Robinson Julia Robinson |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 5 |
| Número | 10 |
| Páginas | e0005205 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-10-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | PLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375 |
| Editorial | Public Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005205 |
| PMID | 41066471 |
| OpenAlex | W4415005855 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 19 |
Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) include postpartum and postabortion family planning (PPFP/PAFP) in their national family planning (FP) commitments. Understanding what PPFP and PAFP data are available in routine health information systems (HIS) is important, as both county-level and global monitoring increasingly rely on these systems to track service delivery and scale-up, inform program improvements, and support accountability. This paper reviews the availability of PPFP and PAFP data elements in HIS across 18 LMICs. We analyzed 85 facility registers and 31 monthly summary forms covering antenatal care (ANC), labor and delivery (L&D), postnatal care (PNC), FP, and postabortion care (PAC). All 18 countries record PPFP provision in registers and summary forms; 14 also capture PAFP provision in registers, with 10 reporting it in summary forms. Most (15/18) collect immediate PPFP (≤48 hours after childbirth), in alignment with recommendations from the PPFP Community of Practice and High Impact Practices partnership, though 6 need to add this to their summary forms to improve data accessibility. Fourteen countries collect PPFP at multiple time points (e.g., ≤ 48 hours and ≤6 weeks). While all collect client age in registers, only one disaggregates PPFP and two disaggregate PAFP by age in summary forms. There is variation in the contraceptive methods recorded and compiled. Documentation of FP counseling is less consistent: 8 countries record it during ANC (2 in summary forms), 7 before discharge after childbirth (2 in summary forms), and 10 during PNC (2 in summary forms). Differences in timing, disaggregation, and method detail affect cross-country comparability, though several countries collect sufficiently aligned data for meaningful analysis. Country efforts to track PPFP across multiple contact points suggest a commitment to broad integration, which should be matched by expanded global indicator guidance that reflects the full scope of service delivery across the continuum of care
Childbirth · Developed country · Developing country · Documentation · Family planning · Health care · Breastfeeding Practices and Influences · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Countdown to 2030
Availability of priority maternal and newborn health indicators
Using routine health information systems for well-designed health evaluations in low- and middle-income countries
PRISM framework
Contraceptive Use Before and After Abortion
Fundamental Elements of the Quality of Care
Fertility Reduction and the Quality of Family Planning Services
Revising the FP Quality of Care Framework in the Context of Rights‐based Family Planning
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |