Critical Elitism
Deliberation, Democracy, and the Problem of Expertise
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19894100 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Alfred Moore (0000-0002-7252-5039, University of Cambridge, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-06-22 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Revista | Critical Elitism (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/9781108159906 |
| OpenAlex | W4246709756 |
| Open Library | OL34556546M |
| ISBN | 9781108159906 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 67 |
Democracies have a problem with expertise. Expert knowledge both mediates and facilitates public apprehension of problems, yet it also threatens to exclude the public from consequential judgments and decisions located in technical domains. This book asks: how can we have inclusion without collapsing the very concept of expertise? How can public judgment be engaged in expert practices in a way that does not reduce to populism? Drawing on deliberative democratic theory and social studies of science, Critical Elitism argues that expert authority depends ultimately on the exercise of public judgment in a context in which there are live possibilities for protest, opposition and scrutiny. This account points to new ways of looking at the role of civil society, expert institutions, and democratic innovations in the constitution of expert authority within democratic systems. Using the example of climate science, Critical Elitism highlights not only the risks but also the benefits of contesting expertise
Context (archaeology) · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Elitism · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Scrutiny · Sociology · Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism · Law · Public Administration · Elite (Social sciences) · Expertise · History & Theory · Philosophy
Expertise-Objections to the Argument from Inductive Risk
The shift to authenticity
Lateral Relations in World Politics
Should Journalists Seek to Promote Civically Useful Attitudes?
Tapping into science advisers’ learning
Democratic education and the epistemic quality of democratic deliberation
Whose Knowledge Counts in the Planning of Urban Sustainability? – Investigating Handbooks for Nudging and Participation
Public Planner – A Deliberative Authority
How Can You Spot the Experts? An Essay in Social Epistemology
Between authority and argumentation
‘Building a Ship while Sailing It.’ Epistemic Humility and the Temporality of Non-knowledge in Political Decision-making on Covid-19
Are Honest Brokers Good for Democracy
Science Advice in an Environment of Trust
Waiting for advice that is beyond doubt
It Takes a Village to Trust Science
Enjoying ‘Expertise’
Democratic meritocracy based on virtue preselection and consent validation – political meritocracy meets electoral democracy
Dealing with the epistemic-democratic tension in policy-making. Institutional design choices for multi-layered democratic innovations
Citizens in Distress
Reality check
Pathologies of democratic deliberation
Intergovernmental Expert Consensus in the Making
An epistemic case for confucian democracy
Rethinking the epistemic case against epistocracy
Evidence in Norwegian child protection interventions – Analysing cases of familial violence
Philosophy, Policy, and Moral Expertise
Worries About Philosopher Experts
Understanding Female White Migrant Academics' Career Narratives
Who Gives Expert Advice? Empirical Evidence From Swedish Policy‐Making
Amazon’s Ring
Negotiating Authority in Facilitation Practice – A Conceptual Framework to Describe Facilitators’ Use of Power in Collaborative Governance
Science advising and democracy
Political Debate Under Epistemic Asymmetries
Toward a Radical Democratic Theory of Expertise
Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism
A realistic view on disagreement
Democratizing Expertise
Conceptualising Digital Democracy—From Technocracy and Populism to a New Concept of Democratic Authority and Participation
Navigating the paradox of consensus
Against modernist illusions
Technical Legitimacy
Political Trust, Commitment and Responsiveness
Expert hearings in mini-publics
The virtues of truth
Negative expertise in conditions of manufactured ignorance
Public reason, values in science, and the shifting boundaries of the political forum
The epistemic quality of expert bodies
Weber's Elephant
Setting the voting agenda for multi-option referendums
Gender Representation in Expert Advisory Bodies
An inquiry into populism’s relation to science
Knowledge-Making in Politics
Well-Being, Harmony, and Deference
Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy
Celebrity, Democracy, and Epistemic Power
Three Models of Democratic Expertise
Covid-19 and the Paradox of Scientific Advice
What about elite manipulation in deliberative mini-publics? Examining threats and resilience in the Ostbelgien model
Democracy has Hamlet’s Problem
Beyond populism and technocracy
Epistemic democracy and the role of experts
Enhancing Democratic Expertise Through Intra‐Party Deliberation
Expert accountability
Criticizing democracy, democratizing critical theory
Depoliticisation, technical discourse, and paper-money
The politics of the ECB's market-based approach to government debt
Epistemic approaches to deliberative democracy
| Obras citantes distintas | 67 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 8,38 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 66 |