Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Critical Elitism

Deliberation, Democracy, and the Problem of Expertise

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19894100
AutoresAlfred Moore (0000-0002-7252-5039, University of Cambridge, autor de correspondencia)
Año2017
Fecha de publicación2017-06-22
Open AccessSí
TipoBOOK
RevistaCritical Elitism (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditorialCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/9781108159906
OpenAlexW4246709756
Open LibraryOL34556546M
ISBN9781108159906
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas67

Democracies have a problem with expertise. Expert knowledge both mediates and facilitates public apprehension of problems, yet it also threatens to exclude the public from consequential judgments and decisions located in technical domains. This book asks: how can we have inclusion without collapsing the very concept of expertise? How can public judgment be engaged in expert practices in a way that does not reduce to populism? Drawing on deliberative democratic theory and social studies of science, Critical Elitism argues that expert authority depends ultimately on the exercise of public judgment in a context in which there are live possibilities for protest, opposition and scrutiny. This account points to new ways of looking at the role of civil society, expert institutions, and democratic innovations in the constitution of expert authority within democratic systems. Using the example of climate science, Critical Elitism highlights not only the risks but also the benefits of contesting expertise

Context (archaeology) · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Elitism · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Scrutiny · Sociology · Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism · Law · Public Administration · Elite (Social sciences) · Expertise · History & Theory · Philosophy

  • Expertise-Objections to the Argument from Inductive Risk

    Open Access•Monte Cairns•Philosophy of Science•2026

  • The shift to authenticity

    Open Access•Lone Sorensen, Benjamin Krämer•Communication Theory•2024

  • Lateral Relations in World Politics

    Open Access•Alejandro M Peña, Thomas Davies•International Studies Review•2022

  • Should Journalists Seek to Promote Civically Useful Attitudes?

    Open Access•Eleanor Gordon-Smith•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2026

  • Tapping into science advisers’ learning

    Open Access•Noam Obermeister•Palgrave Communications•2020

  • Democratic education and the epistemic quality of democratic deliberation

    Open Access•Anniina Leiviskä•Theory and Research in Education•2023

  • Whose Knowledge Counts in the Planning of Urban Sustainability? – Investigating Handbooks for Nudging and Participation

    Open Access•Martin Westin, Sofie Joosse•Planning Theory & Practice•2022

  • Public Planner – A Deliberative Authority

    Open Access•Raine Mäntysalo, Martin Westin et al.•Planning Theory & Practice•2023

  • How Can You Spot the Experts? An Essay in Social Epistemology

    Open Access•Alvin I Goldman•Royal Institute of Philosophy…•2021

  • Between authority and argumentation

    Open Access•Martin Westin, Lars Hallgren et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2024

  • ‘Building a Ship while Sailing It.’ Epistemic Humility and the Temporality of Non-knowledge in Political Decision-making on Covid-19

    Open Access•Jaana Parviainen, Anne Koski et al.•Social Epistemology•2021

  • Are Honest Brokers Good for Democracy

    Darrin Durant•Social Epistemology•2023

  • Science Advice in an Environment of Trust

    Open Access•Torbjørn Gundersen, Cathrine Holst•Social Epistemology•2022

  • Waiting for advice that is beyond doubt

    Christiane Gerblinger•Intelligence & National Security•2022

  • It Takes a Village to Trust Science

    Open Access•Gabriele Contessa•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Enjoying ‘Expertise’

    Open Access•Alex Yates•Representation•2026

  • Democratic meritocracy based on virtue preselection and consent validation – political meritocracy meets electoral democracy

    Wang Zhiwei•Inquiry•2026

  • Dealing with the epistemic-democratic tension in policy-making. Institutional design choices for multi-layered democratic innovations

    Open Access•Eva Krick•Political Research Exchange•2021

  • Citizens in Distress

    Open Access•Mikko Värttö•Social Inclusion•2025

  • Reality check

    Open Access•Alfred Moore•Ethics & Global Politics•2020

  • Pathologies of democratic deliberation

    Open Access•Gabriele Badano, Alasia Nuti•Ethics & Global Politics•2020

  • Intergovernmental Expert Consensus in the Making

    Kari De Pryck•Global Environmental Politics•2020

  • An epistemic case for confucian democracy

    Open Access•Elena Ziliotti•Critical Review of International…•2020

  • Rethinking the epistemic case against epistocracy

    Udit Bhatia•Critical Review of International…•2018

  • Evidence in Norwegian child protection interventions – Analysing cases of familial violence

    Open Access•Audun Gabriel Løvlie•Child & Family Social Work•2022

  • Philosophy, Policy, and Moral Expertise

    Open Access•Jakob Elster, Cathrine Holst•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2024

  • Worries About Philosopher Experts

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2023

  • Understanding Female White Migrant Academics' Career Narratives

    Open Access•Marian Crowley‐Henry, Shamika Almeida et al.•Gender Work and Organization•2025

  • Who Gives Expert Advice? Empirical Evidence From Swedish Policy‐Making

    Open Access•Ronnie Eriksson, Rebecca Eriksson•Governance•2025

  • Amazon’s Ring

    Evan Selinger, Darrin Durant•Science as Culture•2021

  • Negotiating Authority in Facilitation Practice – A Conceptual Framework to Describe Facilitators’ Use of Power in Collaborative Governance

    Open Access•Martin Westin, Emily Montgomerie•Society & Natural Resources•2024

  • Science advising and democracy

    Open Access•Amber Knight•Politics and the Life Sciences•2025

  • Political Debate Under Epistemic Asymmetries

    Janusz Grygieńć•Social Epistemology•2026

  • Toward a Radical Democratic Theory of Expertise

    Open Access•Ari-Elmeri Hyvönen•Political Studies•2025

  • Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism

    Open Access•J Harambam, Kamile Grusauskaite et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2022

  • A realistic view on disagreement

    Open Access•Bernd Simon•Theory & Psychology•2018

  • Democratizing Expertise

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst•Social Epistemology•2025

  • Conceptualising Digital Democracy—From Technocracy and Populism to a New Concept of Democratic Authority and Participation

    Open Access•Oliver Hidalgo, Oliver Fernando Hidalgo•Social Sciences•2026

  • Navigating the paradox of consensus

    Open Access•Emrah Ozdemir, Tuna Taşan-Kok•Planning Theory•2026

  • Against modernist illusions

    Open Access•J Harambam•Journal for Cultural Research•2021

  • Technical Legitimacy

    Open Access•Trym Nohr Fjørtoft•Political Studies•2026

  • Political Trust, Commitment and Responsiveness

    Open Access•Matthew Festenstein•Political Studies•2019

  • Expert hearings in mini-publics

    Open Access•Mikko Leino, Katariina Kulha et al.•Policy Sciences•2022

  • The virtues of truth

    Open Access•Zhichao Tong•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2022

  • Negative expertise in conditions of manufactured ignorance

    Open Access•Jaana Parviainen, Lauri Lahikainen•Synthese•2021

  • Public reason, values in science, and the shifting boundaries of the political forum

    Open Access•Gabriele Badano•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • The epistemic quality of expert bodies

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Johan Christensen•Acta Politica•2024

  • Weber's Elephant

    Simeon John, Stephen John•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • Setting the voting agenda for multi-option referendums

    Open Access•Charlotte C L Wagenaar, Frank Hendriks•Democratization•2021

  • Gender Representation in Expert Advisory Bodies

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Johan Christensen et al.•Politics & Gender•2025

  • An inquiry into populism’s relation to science

    Open Access•Cristóbal Bellolio•Politics•2024

  • Knowledge-Making in Politics

    Open Access•Matthew C Lucky•Political Theory•2024

  • Well-Being, Harmony, and Deference

    Open Access•Zhichao Tong•Political Studies•2025

  • Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Spencer Mckay, Chris Tenove•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Celebrity, Democracy, and Epistemic Power

    Open Access•Alex Archer, Amanda Cawston et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2020

  • Three Models of Democratic Expertise

    Open Access•Alfred Moore•Perspectives on Politics•2021

  • Covid-19 and the Paradox of Scientific Advice

    Open Access•Zeynep Pamuk•Perspectives on Politics•2022

  • What about elite manipulation in deliberative mini-publics? Examining threats and resilience in the Ostbelgien model

    Open Access•Nino Junius•European Political Science Review•2025

  • Democracy has Hamlet’s Problem

    Open Access•Adam Ruzicka, Pavel Dufek et al.•Critical Review•2025

  • Beyond populism and technocracy

    Open Access•Alfred Moore, Carlo Invernizzi-Accetti et al.•Contemporary Political Theory•2020

  • Epistemic democracy and the role of experts

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander•Contemporary Political Theory•2019

  • Enhancing Democratic Expertise Through Intra‐Party Deliberation

    Open Access•Enrico Biale, Giulia Bistagnino•Constellations•2025

  • Expert accountability

    Open Access•Silje A Langvatn, Cathrine Holst•Constellations•2024

  • Criticizing democracy, democratizing critical theory

    Open Access•Kenneth Baynes•Constellations•2021

  • Depoliticisation, technical discourse, and paper-money

    David M Batt, David Batt•Journal of Cultural Economy•2021

  • The politics of the ECB's market-based approach to government debt

    Open Access•Jens Van ’t Klooster•Socio-Economic Review•2023

  • Epistemic approaches to deliberative democracy

    Open Access•John B Min, John K Wong•Philosophy Compass•2018

Obras citantes distintas67
Citas por año8,38
Intervalo de citas2018 - 2026 (9)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 66
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae