Management Divided
Contradictions of Labor Management
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19978112 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Matt Vidal (0000-0001-7189-7482, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-03-18 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Revista | Management Divided (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780198795278.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4283325674 |
| Open Library | OL36273793M |
| ISBN | 9780198795278 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 19 |
This richly evidenced study of American manufacturing documents how one of the central dynamics shaping organizations today is a contradiction managers face between ensuring workforce discipline and harnessing worker creativity. This contradiction has been intensifying over the last four decades as employee involvement has become increasingly important in response to rapid technical change, requirements for flexibility, and demands for continuous improvement. Global best practice in manufacturing includes lean production with substantive worker empowerment: cross training in enlarged tasks and inclusion in problem solving and decision making. Yet, facing conflicting pressures, many managers satisfice by training workers in narrow tasks and using them exclusively for manual labor. Vidal presents a synthetic theory called organizational political economy, integrating concepts from organization theory—institutional logics, organizational fields, managerial satisficing, and operational routines—into a classical marxist framework. Rather than theorizing managers as preoccupied with controlling labor to maximize exploitation, the theory emphasizes how contradictory developments—conflicting pressures and competing logics of labor management—lead management to be divided. Some managers adopt best practice by substantively empowering their workforce while others settle for good enough. Capitalist management is increasingly a source of organizational inefficiency. The argument is not limited to manufacturing or to lean production. Managers experience contradictory pressures—for standardization versus discretion, deskilling versus upskilling, and routine manual versus abstract cognitive labor—in a wide range of occupations, including social services, education, healthcare, office and administrative support, and software development
Business · Contradiction · Deskilling · Discretion · Economics · Lean manufacturing · Political science · Public relations · Work (physics) · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Management and Organizational Studies · Marketing · Political Economy and Marxism
Routine politics of production in post-Fordist manufacturing
New Technology and Work
From Taylorism to teams
What makes work better or worse? An analytical framework
Algorithmus und Kontrolle
Writing Red Taylorism into management history
The conscientious worker
Leadership in neoliberal organizations
The algorithm’s middlemen
Declining Inequality and Persistent Inequality Structures
Between control and participation
Maritime labour regimes in the North Atlantic offshore wind energy industry
What's Talent Got to Do with It? The Collective Labourer and the Rise of Barcelona's Digital Economy
The Labour Process under Worker Control
Coercion, Consent, and Class Consciousness
The Alienation-Insulation Dynamic and the Low-Wage Migrant Work Ethic
Between-Firm Inequality and Informal Social Relations
Shopfloor Apprentices under a Lean Labour Process
Control and Flexibility
| Obras citantes distintas | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4,75 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 19 |