The Struggle for Democracy
Paradoxes of Progress and the Politics of Change
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19986629 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Christopher Meckstroth (0000-0003-2057-1583, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2015 |
| Páginas | 288 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2015-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Revista | Struggle for Democracy (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press, Incorporated (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190213923.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2479722646 |
| ISBN | 9780190213923 |
| Open Library | OL29270977M |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 14 |
When political factions compete over the right to act in the “people’s” name, who is to decide? This problem was left unresolved by the great seventeenth- and eighteenth-century theorists of popular sovereignty and their critics, and it is little closer to being solved today. This book defends a new democratic theory that finally provides an answer. It argues that familiar attempts to define democracy in terms of timeless principles or institutions can only fall into paradox when faced with struggles over democratic founding and change. The only solution is to begin instead from the act of democratic judgment, and to consider the conditions that an outcome would have to meet if it were to count as a case of the people deciding what it will mean to govern themselves in a democratic way. The only way to work this out without stacking the deck is then to show, in Socratic fashion, that some parties’ claims to speak for “the people” cannot hold up consistently even on their own terms. The book defends controversial interpretations of Plato, Kant, and Hegel to show how familiar portrayals of each as seeking to ground politics directly in metaphysical foundations obscures an important tradition of radically antifoundational argument in the history of political thought. And then it reworks this sort of argument in a thoroughly democratic direction to defend a historical and Socratic theory of democracy that advances an entirely new approach to contested notions of progress, popular sovereignty, and democratic change.
anti-foundationalism · Argument (complex analysis) · Democracy · democratic change · Democratic legitimacy · Democratic Theory · Epistemology · Hegel · Hegelianism · Immanuel Kant · Law and economics · Metaphysics · Plato · Political change · Political economy · Political philosophy · political progress · Political science · Politics · Popular sovereignty · self-government · Sociology · Socratic method · Sovereignty · Critical Theory and Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theory and Democracy · Political Theory and Influence · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought · Democratization
Caesarism and Republicanism in the Political Thought of Thomas E. Watson
Reframing civil disobedience
Response to Destri
Debilitated democracy
Com Honneth contra Honneth a favor de Habermas
Locating international education as a site to debate and re-imagine democracy in Canada
Paradoxes of democracy
The aesthetics of Burke’s constitutionalism
Honneth e as patologias do direito
Political Legitimacy as an Existential Predicament
Joseph Schumpeter's Caesarist Democracy
Putting proximity in its place
Two bad halves don't make a whole
The populist leader's two bodies
| Citas por año | 1,27 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Altamente citado | No |