Empire by Treaty
Negotiating European Expansion, 1600-1900
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19989941 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Saliha Belmessou (0000-0001-9392-8921, autor de correspondencia) |
| Editores | Saliha Belmessous |
| Año | 2014 |
| Páginas | 304 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2014-11-27 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Revista | Empire by Treaty (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199391783.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W579072269 |
| Open Library | OL27557042M |
| ISBN | 9780199391783 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 14 |
This book is part of an intellectual project aimed at including indigenous voices in the debate over European appropriation of overseas territories. It is concerned with European efforts to negotiate with indigenous peoples the cession of their sovereignty through treaties. To grasp the extent of European legal engagement with indigenous peoples, the book examines the history of treaty making in European empires (Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, French, and British) from the early 17th to the late 19th century, that is, during both stages of European imperialism. While scholars have often dismissed treaties, assuming that they would have been fraudulent or unequal, this book argues that there was more to the practice of treaty making than mere commercial and political opportunism. Indeed treaty making was also promoted by Europeans as a more legitimate means of appropriating indigenous sovereignties and acquiring land than were conquest or occupation, and therefore as a way to reconcile expansion with moral and juridical legitimacy. As for indigenous peoples, they engaged in treaty making as a way to further their interests even if, on the whole, they gained far less than the Europeans and often less than they bargained for. The vexed history of treaty making presents particular challenges for the great expectations placed in treaties for the resolution of conflicts over indigenous rights in postcolonial societies. These hopes are held by both indigenous peoples and representatives of the post-colonial state and yet, both must come to terms with the complex and troubled history of treaty-making over 400 years of empire
Appropriation · British Empire · Colonialism · Empire · Indigenous · Political science · Politics · Sovereignty · Treaty · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law · New Caledonia Indigenous Studies · Claims · Colonies · Europe · foreign relations · History · Indigenous peoples · law and legislation · Territorial expansion · treaties · Treaty-making power
The Arctic thaw
Empires and protection
Indigenizing International Law in Early Twentieth-Century China
From Atlantic Creoles to African Nationalists
Negotiating with the “Infidel”
The Statistical Table as Colonial Knowledge
The Violence Within
Toleration, Treaty, and Dissent in William Penn’s “Holy Experiment”
The league of nations as an imperial assemblage
Lex Mercatoria , Legal Pluralism, and the Modern State through the Lens of the East India Company, 1600–1757
Consenting to Early Modern Empires
Passes and Protection in the Making of a British Mediterranean
Settler Federalism and the Conditions of Indigenous Autonomy
Regulatory capture in the British Empire
| Obras citantes distintas | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,17 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |