Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Saving the News

Why the Constitution Calls for Government Action to Preserve Freedom of Speech

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20004895
AutoresMartha Minow (Professor of Law and Former Dean, Harvard Law School, autor de correspondencia)
Año2021
Páginas233
Fecha de publicación2021-07-21
Open AccessNo
TipoBOOK
RevistaChanging Ecosystem of the News (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditorialOxford University PressNew York (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780190948412.001.0001
OpenAlexW4206631844
Open LibraryOL34689201M
ISBN9780190948412
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6

This book argues that US democracy presumes a news industry but that industry currently is failing. It focuses on the contributions of digital platforms and legal rules to the current situation and on the government's responsibilities for alleviating the problem. As the book shows, the First Amendment of the US Constitution assumes the existence and durability of a private industry. Despite some concerns that government action now is not permitted, nothing in the Constitution forecloses government action to regulate concentrated economic power, to require disclosure of who is financing communications, or to support news initiatives where there are market failures. Moreover, the federal government always been involved in shaping the media environment; it has contributed financial resources, laws, and regulations to develop and shape media in the United States. The government has subsidized development of the internet and crafted legal immunities for digital platforms; the government has crafted the direction and contours of America's media ecosystem. The shift of people’s attention to media platforms that borrow news stories without paying for them and spread misinformation jeopardizes journalism, reliable news sources, and the very respect for truth-telling. To maintain government accountability and inform a public as required in a democracy, The book outlines an array of reforms, including a new fairness doctrine, regulating digital platforms as public utilities, using antitrust authority to regulate the media, policing fraud, and more robust funding of public media. As the text stresses, such reforms are not merely plausible ideas; they are the kinds of initiatives needed if the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of the press continues to hold meaning in the twenty-first century

Accountability · Business · Constitution · Democracy · Government (linguistics) · Journalism · Misinformation · News media · Political science · Politics · Public interest · Public relations · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Public Administration · Economic aspects · Freedom of the press · Press law · united states

  • A Precautionary Tale

    Open Access•Ann Pearman, Mackenzie Hughes et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • A Failure to Educate

    Carl A Grant, Paul Grant et al.•The Educational Forum•2022

  • Funding Without Strings

    Marius Dragomir•Journalism Practice•2025

  • Universal basic income and expressive freedom

    Francesco Stellin Sturino•Critical Review of International…•2026

  • Social Media as a Seed of Connective Democracy in Myanmar (Burma)

    Open Access•Do Kyun David Kim, Isaac Kim•Social Media + Society•2025

  • A Lost Decade

    Open Access•Sewell Chan•The Annals of the American…•2023

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año1,5
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2026 (5)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae