Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

How to Talk to a Science Denier

Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20006798
AutoresLee Mcintyre (0000-0003-0607-8151, autor de correspondencia), Lee C Mcintyre
Año2021
Páginas264
Fecha de publicación2021-08-17
Open AccessNo
TipoBOOK
RevistaHow to Talk to a Science Denier (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditorialThe MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.7551/mitpress/13918.001.0001
OpenAlexW4244417662
Open LibraryOL34138453M
ISBN9780262366724
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas22
Referencias citadas15

Can we change the minds of science deniers? Encounters with flat earthers, anti-vaxxers, coronavirus truthers, and others. “Climate change is a hoax—and so is coronavirus.” “Vaccines are bad for you.” These days, many of our fellow citizens reject scientific expertise and prefer ideology to facts. They are not merely uninformed—they are misinformed. They cite cherry-picked evidence, rely on fake experts, and believe conspiracy theories. How can we convince such people otherwise? How can we get them to change their minds and accept the facts when they don't believe in facts? In this book, Lee McIntyre shows that anyone can fight back against science deniers, and argues that it's important to do so. Science denial can kill. Drawing on his own experience—including a visit to a Flat Earth convention—as well as academic research, McIntyre outlines the common themes of science denialism, present in misinformation campaigns ranging from tobacco companies' denial in the 1950s that smoking causes lung cancer to today's anti-vaxxers. He describes attempts to use his persuasive powers as a philosopher to convert Flat Earthers; surprising discussions with coal miners; and conversations with a scientist friend about genetically modified organisms in food. McIntyre offers tools and techniques for communicating the truth and values of science, emphasizing that the most important way to reach science deniers is to talk to them calmly and respectfully—to put ourselves out there, and meet them face to face

Aesthetics · Denial · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept) · Fake news · Hoax · Media studies · Misinformation · Paranormal · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Science communication · Science education · Social science · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Pseudoscience · Public opinion · Reasoning · Science · Social aspects · Truthfulness and falsehood

  • Science Denial

    Open Access•Gabriele Contessa•Science Denial•2025

  • Science Studies, public understanding of science, and the long shadow of teleology

    Douglas Allchin

  • Beyond the Thinking/Feeling Binary

    Open Access•John J Thatamanil•Journal of the American Academy…•2026

  • Effectiveness of training actions aimed at improving critical thinking in the face of mis- and disinformation

    Open Access•José Manuel Marcos-Vílchez, José A Muñiz-Velázquez et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Posverdad y ontopolítica en el movimiento antigénero

    Open Access•Siobhan Guerrero Mc Manu•Revista Interdisciplinaria de…•2026

  • When belief becomes research

    Open Access•Katie Greer, Stephanie Beene•Frontiers in Communication•2024

  • Demarcation that Makes the Layperson Smart

    Open Access•Szymon Makuła•Journal for General Philosophy of…•2025

  • Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition

    Open Access•Hans V Hansen•Argumentation•2023

  • Post-Enquiry and Disagreement. A Socio-Epistemological Model of the Normative Significance of Disagreement Between Scientists and Denialists

    Filippo Ferrari, Sebastiano Moruzzi•Social Epistemology•2023

  • Rethinking Metaphors

    Open Access•Luciana Dantas De Paula•Human Arenas•2026

  • From Folklore to Conspiracy Beliefs

    Open Access•Maria Chiara Pozzoni, Giuseppe Quattromini•Genealogy•2024

  • Anti-Intellectualism?” Situating Javier Milei’s Discourse About Science

    Valeria Edelsztein, Claudio Cormick•Global Society•2025

  • Making Sense of Science Denialism

    Alexandre Billon•Social Epistemology•2026

  • Science and the Public

    Open Access•Angela Potochnik•Science and the Public•2024

  • Public Engagement with Science

    Open Access•Angela Potochnik, Melissa Jacquart•Public Engagement with Science•2025

  • Pseudo-scientific versus anti-scientific online conspiracism

    Open Access•Federico Pilati, T Venturini et al.•New Media & Society•2024

  • Nihilistic Distrust

    Open Access•Cayla Clinkenbeard•Philosophy & Technology•2025

  • You know Birds Aren’t Real isn’t real, right?” Working Through Communication and Media Studies Student Affect in the Critical Communication Classroom

    Penelope Ironstone•Canadian Journal of Communication•2026

  • Dilemmes moraux et politiques pendant la pandémie de coronavirus

    Stelios Virvidakis, Jacob Dahl Rendtorff et al.•Diogène•2022

  • Public Health, Science, and the Public’s Trust

    Kenneth R De Camargo Jr•American Journal of Public Health•2026

  • Disputed expertise and chaotic disinformation

    Open Access•Kenneth R De Camargo Jr•Transcultural Psychiatric…•2024

  • Motivated ignorance and social identity threat

    Ian Jones, A Adam et al.•Social Identities•2023

  • Science as Social Knowledge

    Helen E Longino•Science As Social Knowledge•1990

  • Denialism

    Open Access•Pascal Diethelm, Martin Mckee•European Journal of Public Health•2008

  • Science as Social Knowledge

    Helen E Longino•Science As Social Knowledge•2020

  • Anti-vaxxers how to challenge a misinformed movement

    Jonathan M Berman•Anti-Vaxxers•2020

  • Motivated Rejection of Science

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Klaus Oberauer•Current Directions in Psychological…•2016

  • Dark Money

    Open Access•Robert G Boatright•The Forum•2016

  • Science as Social Knowledge

    Ullica Segerstrale, Helen E Longino•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1992

  • Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions

    Open Access•Peter Schmid, Cornelia Betsch•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

  • Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship

    James H Kuklinski, Paul J Quirk et al.•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Ideologues without Issues

    Open Access•L Mason•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • The Affective Tipping Point

    Open Access•David P Redlawsk, Andrew J W Civettini et al.•Political Psychology•2010

  • When Corrections Fail

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler•Political Behavior•2010

  • Countering science denial

    Open Access•Sander Van Der Linden•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

Obras citantes distintas22
Citas por año5,5
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2026 (5)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 22
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae