Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Archaeology and the Fortress of Rationality

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20083304
AutoresD Byrne (0000-0001-9799-8572, autor de correspondencia)
Año2009
Páginas68-88
Fecha de publicación2009-03-27
Open AccessNo
TipoCHAPTER
RevistaCosmopolitan Archaeologies (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditorialDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/9780822392422-004
OpenAlexW2271084264
ISBN9780822392422
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas18

i archaeology and the fortress of rationality If environmental conservation conjures its own global spatial universe out of a deliberate focus on the needs of biodiversity rather than the needs of people living in or near protected areas (Hughes 2005: 157; Tsing 2000), archaeological heritage conservation might be said to conjure a global spatial universe of its own.This latter is an order of space defined by the discourses of archaeology and heritage.It exists in the imaginary of national and international archaeology and heritage practice and is largely unknown to local people despite the fact that they dwell in it.It is unknown to them insofar as the old objects and places that populate this space-the equivalent of nature conservation's biodiversity-are known to them in other terms.Practitioners of archaeology and heritage conservation who are committed to a cosmopolitan view seek to accommodate these local realities via a " values approach" that endeavors to canvass, document, and assess the multiple meanings that old objects and places can have (e.g., Avrami et al. 2000; Byrne 2008) using such value categories as the scientific, the social, the aesthetic, and the historical.A parallel values approach is employed by many nature conservationists who reject the "fortress conservation" approach (Borrini-Feyerabend et al. 2004; Brockington 2002 Brockington , 2004;; Colchester 2004: 94; Harmon and Putney 2003).As the name implies, fortress conservation seeks to protect national parks from local people, who frequently become the subject of expulsion and forced resettlement (see chapter 4 by Meskell, this volume; Phillips 2003: 12). 1 They join the ranks of the world's "conservation refugees." 2 My geographic focus here is Southeast Asia, a region where forced resettlement of people from archaeological conservation zones is by no means unknown today.There is, however, another dimension to fortress conservation in the Southeast Asian heritage field that, though less traumatic for those on its receiving end, is far more pervasive

Ancient history · Archaeology · Epistemology · Geography · Rationality · Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History · Archaeological Research and Protection · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · History · Philosophy

  • Cultural Landscapes as a Heritage Strategy to Empower Local Communities in Indonesia

    Joëlla Van Donkersgoed•Interdisciplinary Contributions…•2026

  • Heritage destruction and cultural rights

    Anne-Laura Kraak•International Journal of Heritage…•2018

  • Heritage Assemblages. The Heritage Site of Borobudur (Indonesia) as a Cultural Landscape

    Open Access•Adèle Esposito Andujar•Moussons•2020

  • Unexpected Encounters with Deep Time Enchantment. Bog Bodies, Crannogs and ‘Otherworldly’ sites. The materializing powers of disjunctures in time

    Christina Fredengren•World Archaeology•2016

  • Curated decay of invisible heritage

    Open Access•Haklak CHOI•International Journal of Heritage…•2026

  • Heritage and the Right to the City

    M Herzfeld•Heritage & Society•2015

  • La fabrique urbaine et territoriale du champ patrimonial en Asie du Sud-Est. Lectures croisées à travers les projets, les mots et les acteurs

    Open Access•Adèle Esposito Andujar, Charles Goldblum et al.•Moussons•2020

  • Fragments Shored against Ruins

    Open Access•Paul Gillen•Cultural Studies Review•2010

  • Designing for authenticity

    Keith Kay Hin Tan, Camelia May Li Kusumo•Journal of Heritage Tourism•2020

  • Teaching Archaeological Pasts in South Africa

    Open Access•Rachel King•Archaeologies•2012

  • New Users and Changing Traditions—(Re)Defining Sami Offering Sites

    Open Access•Tiina Äikäs, M Spangen•European Journal of Archaeology•2015

  • Transcending the Culture-Nature Divide in Cultural Heritage

    Open Access•Sally Brockwell, Sue O''Connor et al.•Transcending the Culture?Nature…•2013

  • Divinely significant

    D Byrne•International Journal of Heritage…•2020

  • Toilets first, temples second

    L Meskell•International Journal of Heritage…•2021

  • Heritage and corruption

    M Herzfeld•International Journal of Heritage…•2015

  • Spirits and the ever-changing heritage

    Anna Karlström•Material Religion•2013

  • Archaeological heritage and cultural intimacy

    Open Access•D Byrne•Journal of Social Archaeology•2011

  • Engagement, Gentrification, and the Neoliberal Hijacking of History

    M Herzfeld•Current Anthropology•2010

Citas por año1,13
Intervalo de citas2010 - 2026 (17)
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae