Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Projection, Recognition, and Pictorial Diversity

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20142701
AutoresAndrew Inkpin (0000-0003-0126-9979, The University of Melbourne, autor de correspondencia)
Año2016
Volumen82
Número1
Páginas32-55
Fecha de publicación2016-02-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaTheoria (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/theo.12074
OpenAlexW1498877894
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas16

This article focuses on the difficulty for a general theory of depiction of providing a notion of pictorial content that accommodates the full diversity of picture types. The article begins by introducing two basic models of pictorial content using paradigmatic positions that maximize the ability of the respective models to deal with pictorial diversity. K ulvicki's O n I mages is interpreted as a generalized projection‐based model which proposes a scene‐centred notion of pictorial content. By contrast, L opes's aspect‐recognition theory, in U nderstanding P ictures , is taken to exemplify a recognition‐based model of pictorial content. It is then considered how applicable these two notions of pictorial content are to a spectrum of different picture types (e.g., photography, painting, caricature), highlighting differences between mechanically produced and “freehand” pictures. It is shown that while the projection‐based and recognition‐based models are each required for some picture types, neither model can be applied over the whole spectrum of diverse picture types. This, it is argued, has the far‐reaching consequence that neither the projection model nor the recognition model, nor any unitary combination of the two, can provide the basis for a theory of depiction applying to all pictures

Algorithm · Art · Computer vision · Content (measure theory) · Depiction · Diversity (politics) · Painting · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Photography · Projection (relational algebra) · Sociology · Unitary state · Visual arts · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Mathematics · Photography and Visual Culture · Visual Culture and Art Theory

  • Merleau-Ponty’s ‘sensible ideas’ and embodied-embedded practice

    Open Access•Andrew Inkpin•Phenomenology and the Cognitive…•2023

  • Deeper into Pictures

    Open Access•Flint Schier•Deeper into Pictures•1986

  • Images and understanding

    Olivier Hekster•Commodus•2002

  • Languages of Art

    Nelson Goodman•Languages of Art•1976

  • Picture, Image and Experience

    Sonia Sedivy, Robert Hopkins•The Philosophical Review•2001

  • Depiction

    Christopher Peacocke•The Philosophical Review•1987

  • Part of What a Picture Is

    Kent Bach•The British Journal of Aesthetics•1970

  • On Information Available in Pictures

    E H Gombrich, Rudolf Arnheim et al.•Leonardo•1971

  • The Information Available in Pictures

    James J Gibson•Leonardo•1971

  • Transparent Pictures

    Kendall L Walton•Critical Inquiry•1984

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,33
Intervalo de citas2023 - 2023 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae