The IMF, the World Bank, and U.S. Foreign Policy in Ecuador, 1956-1966
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 20152320 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jon V Kofas (Indiana University Kokomo, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2001 |
| Volumen | 28 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 50-83 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2001-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Latin American Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0094-582X • E-ISSN: 1552-678X |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0094582x0102800504 |
| OpenAlex | W2044794105 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 15 |
Ecuador is rich in natural resources, but since its independence it has remained one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere. Historically dominated by a few wealthy landowning families, Ecuador's Indian peasants and mestizo workers were excluded from mainstream political, military, economic, and social institutions. Class divisions were paralleled by the regional schism between the agriculturally dependent indigenous people of the temperate highlands and the coastal population, whose livelihood emanated from plantation crops, light manufacturing, commerce, finance, and service industries (Hurtado, 1977:191; Schodt, 1987: 1-15; Blanksten, 1964: 28-31; Public Record Office, Foreign Office Archives [hereafter F.O.] 371148002, AS 2182/1, 18 February 1960). With almost 80 percent ownership of land, the oligarchy, which had investments in light industry, finance, and commerce and made up a tiny percentage of the 4.2 million people in 1960, dominated politics and determined the country's economic destiny. Because the state pursued policies that perpetuated the upper classes' privileged economic status, which is reflected in the grossly unequal income distribution of the second half of the twentieth century, workers have not experienced upward socioeconomic mobility comparable to that in Europe, Canada, or the United States. Foreign development and stabilization loans that the United States and the multilateral banks granted to Ecuador during the cold war perpetuated the uneven income distribution and dependency on foreign capital (Cardoso and Helwege, 1992; Pyne, 1973: 17). During the export-oriented growth period of 1948-1960 while the banana boom lasted, Ecuador enjoyed relative political and monetary stability. In the mid1950s, however, the prices of raw-material exports declined relative to prices of manufactured imports, forcing Ecuador to rely on foreign loans to
Business · Financial system · Foreign policy · Political science · Politics · International Development and Aid · Law
The Influence of Corporate Interests on Usaid's Development Agenda
Highland Afro-Ecuadorian Bomba and Identity along the Black Pacific at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century
Democracy, Authoritarianism and Global Economic Governance
Como o Banco Mundial se Engajou na Neoliberalização do Capitalismo Global? Aspectos Financeiros, Políticos, Sociais e Intelectuais
How did the World Bank Engage in the Neoliberalization of Global Capitalism? Financial, Political, Social, and Intellectual Aspects
Seguindo O Dinheiro
The World Bank's 'Assault on Poverty' as a Political Question (1968-81)
The Silence of Numbers
The Military Coup d’Etat as a Political Process
U.S. Aid to Latin America
The effects of IMF programs in the Third World
Below the line
Toward renewed economic growth in Latin America
Politics and Petroleum in Ecuador
Underdevelopment in Spanish America
Indigenous Peasant Struggles and the Capitalist Modernization of Agriculture
Debt and Devaluation
The Alliance That Lost Its Way
El proceso de dominación política en Ecuador
Politics and Petroleum in Ecuador
Latin America
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,57 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |