Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Financial Crisis, Social Pathologies and 'Generalised Perversion'

Questioning Žižek's Diagnosis of the Times

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20187613
AutoresGeoff Boucher, Geoff M Boucher (0000-0002-2768-9958), Matthew Sharpe, Matt Sharpe (0000-0002-8165-5775)
Año2011
Volumen72
Número72
Páginas64-79
Fecha de publicación2011-08-14
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaNew Formations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0950-2378 • E-ISSN: 1741-0789
EditorialLawrence and Wishart (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3898/newf.72.05.2011
OpenAlexW2021541071
IdiomaEN

Slavoj Zizek's work has been highly influential in the formulation of an emerging consensus among Lacanian social researchers, that we live in a society of generalised perversion whose initial fruits are the corrosion of democracy and the recent financial crisis. This position rests upon a notion of modern subjectivity that connects ‘commodity fetishism’ with clinical perversion in a pathological configuration, so that social theoretical identification of crisis tendencies, evaluative language about moral problems and diagnostic categories from the Lacanian clinic can be combined in a single figure. In this article, we question the series of conceptual links that constitute this position, tracing them from Zizek’s critique in his short work on the global financial crisis and his broader restatement of this analysis in the recent Living in the End Times, through the moment of his announcement of the notion of ‘generalised perversion’ in The Ticklish Subject, all the way back to fundamental propositions outlined in his earliest work. Our argument progresses through three claims. First, we show in the evolution of this position that it leads Zizek to equivocate in his diagnosis of contemporary society between two mutually exclusive categories (‘psychosis’ and ‘perversion’), indicating an antinomy in his work that is resolved in favour of ‘generalised perversion’ on empirical, not logical, grounds. Secondly, we offer a critical resolution of the antinomy through a critique of what we argue is Zizek’s mistaken over-extension of psychoanalytic reason beyond its legitimate scope of application. Finally, we point to some of the political implications of the way that Zizek speculatively resolves his logical difficulties, by analysing the consequences of his claim that generalised social perversion - the problem to be solved - involves a dethroning of the communal ego ideal. A communitarian streak, implicit in the potential conflation of moral denunciation with psychoanalytic diagnosis that the rhetoric of ‘perversion’ invokes, runs through Zizek’s work on capitalism, we propose in conclusion

Economics · Financial crisis · Financial system · Keynesian economics · Perversion · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Medicine · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics · Psychology · Finance

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae