Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Disintegrating chronology

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20193005
AutoresSimon Lilley (0000-0002-6754-8025, University of Glasgow, autor de correspondencia)
Año1995
Volumen1
Número2
Páginas267-299
Fecha de publicación1995-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaStudies in Cultures Organizations and Societies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1024-5286
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10245289508523459
OpenAlexW4242110290
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas12

This paper utilises the rhetorical device of chronology, a device which helps to instantiate the ‘modern’ world, in order to demonstrate the “reversible imminence” of that world. It seeks to build upon other attempts at ‘postmodern’ writing which have relied on flouting modernist conventions to signify themselves as ‘innovative’. But rather than constructing another new ‘style’ that cuts across conventions in writing, the paper seeks to complement such ‘innovation’ through intensifying its reliance on one of these conventions. The paper illustrates how a diligent and detailed application of the demands of chronology can result in a history that deconstructs itself, or to put it another way, how a faithful adherence to one of the demands of ‘modernist’ writing can itself create a text that fragments into ‘postmodernist’ writing. The author examined participants’ accounts of the emergence of refinery based computerised oil management systems. These accounts sought to instantiate at least partially enduring organisational and self identities through rhetorics of progress in the face of disorder. However, much of this disorder may be seen to be an effect of extended ordering practices. The chief threat to the maintenance of identities thus turns out to be the ordering practices upon which these identities depend. An impression of progress was seen to rely upon a re-presentation of reflexive process as discrete events, as innumerable black boxes, enabling a (re)integration through separation. But when the author brought these boxes and their contents back together, ‘progress’ disintegrated. Who makes up real things, dad? Nobody and everybody; they make themselves up. The thing is that because the real stories just happen, they don’t always tell you very much. Sometimes they do, but usually they’re too . . . messy.’ Iain Banks, The Crow Road

Aesthetics · Art · Business · Computer security · Epistemology · Literature · nobody · Postmodernism · Reflexivity · Rhetorical question · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis · Philosophy · Rhetoric and Communication Studies

  • Choice, rationality, and social theory

    Barry Hindess•Choice, rationality, and social…•1988

  • Post-Modern Ethnography

    Stephen A Tyler•Writing Culture•1986

  • “Time is money”

    Anne Loft•Studies in Cultures Organizations…•1995

  • The Quest for Authority and Honor in the American Professions, 1750-1900

    Harold M Hyman, Samuel Haber•Journal of the Early Republic•1992

  • Rethinking Management and Managerial Work

    Open Access•Hugh Willmott•Human Relations•1997

  • We Have Never Been Modern

    T Hugh Crawford, Tony Crawford•Configurations•1994

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae