The Shifting Dynamics of Sunnī–Shīʿī Leadership in the Gaza Crisis
Iran’s Political Theology as a Lens
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 20249782 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mouad Faitour (0009-0001-5702-6493, University of Georgia, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 16 |
| Número | 11 |
| Páginas | 1394 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Editorial | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel16111394 |
| OpenAlex | W4415813807 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 16 |
This article explores the evolving roles of Sunnī and Shīʿī political actors in the current Gaza crisis, with a focus on how Iran has come to occupy the rhetorical and symbolic space once dominated by Sunnī Arab leadership. Historically, since the establishment of Israel in 1948, Sunnī regimes positioned themselves as the primary defenders of the Palestinian cause. However, recent shifts—originating in the late 1970s and evolving into the current wave of normalization agreements between Arab states and Israel—have weakened this leadership role. In this vacuum, Iran has articulated a theological-political narrative grounded in Shīʿī doctrines of resistance, martyrdom, and moral duty toward the oppressed, reframed through Khomeinist ideology to legitimize its regional geopolitical ambitions. Drawing on political theology as a theoretical framework, this article analyzes how sacred history shapes Iran’s foreign policy discourse and legitimizes its regional role. This article argues that the current Gaza crisis illustrates a significant transformation in the religious-political landscape of the Muslim world, as Iran leverages its Shīʿī identity to assert moral and political leadership over a cause once firmly associated with Sunnī solidarity. This study concludes that Shīʿism, led by Iran, has shown unwavering support for the Palestinian cause through its backing of Hamas in its latest conflict, despite Iran’s simultaneous pursuit of wider regional drives and ideological goals. Still, Iran’s foreign policies cannot be separated from the historical incidents that gave rise to the Shīʿī tradition of protest and resistance, which remain integral to how Iran’s Shīʿism positions itself in the present conflict
Foreign policy · Geopolitics · Ideology · International relations · Narrative · Politics · Islamic Studies and History · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Turkey's Politics and Society
Islamic Perspectives on International Conflict Resolution
Risks, Resilience and Interdependency
Sectarianization
The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam
Redemptive Suffering in Islam
Islam, the State, and Political Authority
Shi'ism
Arab State Narratives on Normalization with Israel
Political Theology in Iran
Forget Schmitt! Political Theology Must Follow Agamben’s “Double Paradigm” of Sovereignty
The war on Gaza and Iraq’s resistance state
Grasping Arab Islamist responses to the war on Gaza
Carl Schmitt’s Political Theology
The shifting dynamics of amity and enmity in the Middle East
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |