Fostering Incentive-Based Policies and Partnerships for Integrated Watershed Management in the Southeast Asian Uplands
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 20250655 |
|---|---|
| Autores | A Neef (0000-0002-5079-3323, Kyoto University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2012 |
| Volumen | 1 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 247-271 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2012-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Southeast Asian studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2186-7275 • E-ISSN: 2423-8686 |
| Editorial | Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.20495/seas.1.2_247 |
| OpenAlex | W2098236116 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 20 |
This paper attempts to identify the major factors associated with some of the failures and successes of integrated watershed management policies and projects with a particular emphasis on the uplands of mainland Southeast Asia. It argues that many policy measures have been misguided by failing to acknowledge the multidimensional facets of sustainable watershed management and putting too much emphasis on command-and-control approaches to resource management and onesize-fits-all conservation models. Attempts to introduce soil and water conservation measures, for instance, have largely failed because they concentrated merely on the technical feasibility and potential ecological effects, while neglecting economic viability and socio-cultural acceptance. The production of agricultural commodities, on the other hand, has mostly been market-driven and often induced boom and bust cycles that compromised the ecological and social dimensions of sustainability. Purely community-based approaches to watershed management, on their part, have often failed to address issues of elite capture and competing interests within and between heterogeneous uplands communities. Drawing on a review of recent experience and on lessons from initiatives in along-term collaborative research program in Thailand (The Uplands Program) aimed at bridging the various dimensions of sustainability in the Southeast Asian uplands, this paper discusses how a socially, institutionally and ecologically sustainable mixof agricultural production, ecosystem services and rural livelihood opportunities can be achieved through incentive-based policies and multi-stakeholder partnerships that attempt to overcome the (perceived) antagonism between conservation and development in upland watersheds of Southeast Asia
Agriculture · Business · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Incentive · Livelihood · Natural resource economics · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Watershed · Watershed Management · Cambodian History and Society · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Ecology
The Rubber Juggernaut
Governing the Commons
CBNRM communities in action
Can rewards for environmental services benefit the poor? Lessons from Asia
Using Traditional Swidden Agriculture to Enhance Rural Livelihoods in Vietnam's Uplands
The Politics of Conservation and the Complexity of Local Control of Forests in the Northern Thai Highlands
The governance of ecosystem services from tropical upland watersheds
Willingness of upstream and downstream resource managers to engage in compensation schemes for environmental services
Rewarding the upland poor for saving the commons? Evidence from Southeast Asia
Variations of Late Socialist Development
Transforming the ``model'' approach to upland rural development in Vietnam
Can Paper Mulberry Contribute to Building Sustainable Rural Livelihoods in Northern Laos
Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources
Land titling policy and soil conservation in the northern uplands of Vietnam
Engaging Simplifications
A Strategic Approach to Multistakeholder Negotiations
Trends and Future Potential of Payment for Ecosystem Services to Alleviate Rural Poverty in Developing Countries
The Moral Economy of the Peasant
Land grabs, land control, and Southeast Asian crop booms
Policies, Political-Economy, and Swidden in Southeast Asia
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,22 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2017 - 2018 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |