Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Me too fragments in English and French

A direct interpretation approach

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20344128
AutoresAlexis Abeille (0000-0002-9187-2298, Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle , Université Paris Cité , Paris , France), J B Kim (0000-0003-3286-0446, Kyung Hee University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2022
Volumen39
Número3
Páginas495-524
Fecha de publicación2022-09-27
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Linguistic Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0167-6318 • E-ISSN: 1613-3676
EditorialWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/tlr-2022-2095
OpenAlexW4286008855
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas28

Additive fragments, comprising a nominal remnant and an additive adverb (e.g., too , either ), are a particular type of stripping. On the basis of new corpus data in English and French, we show that such fragments do not always have a verbal clause as their antecedent, and that when they do, different kinds of mismatch are possible between a verbal equivalent and the actual fragment. This challenges most approaches based on syntactic reconstruction. We also show that their interpretation is more flexible than previously thought, since they can be used for interrogative, exclamatory, or ordering purposes. We distinguish between their contrastive (non-coreferent) use ( A: John left. B: Me too .) and emphatic (coreferent) use (A: John left. B: HIM too!). We propose a direct interpretation analysis that resorts to no syntactic reconstruction of a verbal clause. The proposed analysis, developed within the framework of construction-based HPSG, allows us to capture not only their properties sharing with other fragments (short answers and negative stripping) but also their unique constructional properties

Adverb · Algorithm · Generative grammar · Head-driven phrase structure grammar · Interrogative · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

  • The effect of gender (mis)match on the interpretation of English reflexive pronouns in cases of VP-ellipsis by native and non-native speakers of English

    Open Access•Evelyn Gandón-Chapela, Francisco Gallardo-Del-Puerto•Glossa a journal of general…•2025

  • Preposition omission under English pseudogapping

    Open Access•Joanna Nykiel•Glossa a journal of general…•2025

  • Preposition omission in French interrogative sluices

    Open Access•Amal Hassen, Alexis Abeille•Glossa a journal of general…•2025

  • Parametric Differences Between English and Korean Response Particles

    Open Access•J B Kim•Studia Linguistica•2024

  • The empirical turn and its consequences for theoretical syntax

    Alexis Abeille•Theoretical Linguistics•2024

  • Introduction to the special issue Experimental and Corpus-based Approaches to Ellipsis

    Open Access•Gabriela Bîlbîie, Joanna Nykiel•Journal of Linguistics•2023

  • The Interactive Stance

    Jonathan Ginzburg•The interactive stance•2012

  • Simpler Syntax

    Peter W Culicover, Ray Jackendoff•Simpler syntax•2005

  • The Syntax of Silence

    Jason Merchant•The syntax of silence•2001

  • Fragments and ellipsis

    Open Access•Jason Merchant•Linguistics and Philosophy•2005

  • The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language

    Open Access•Rodney Huddleston, Geoffrey K Pullum et al.•Cambridge Grammar of the English…•2002

  • Additive Particles and Polarity

    Hotze Rullmann•Journal of Semantics•2003

  • L’ellipse verbale enchâssée dans les langues romanes

    Gabriela Bîlbîie, Israel De La Fuente et al.•Langages•2021

  • Negation without Head-Movement

    Open Access•J B Kim, Jong-Bok Kim et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2002

  • French Clitic Movement Without Clitics or Movement

    Open Access•Philip Miller, Philip H Miller et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1997

  • Optionality in the Use of Too

    Open Access•Pascal Amsili, Emilia ELLSIEPEN et al.•Revista da ABRALIN•2016

  • Fragments and structural identity on a direct interpretation approach

    Open Access•Joanna Nykiel, J B Kim et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2021

  • English relative clause constructions

    Open Access•Ivan A Sag•Journal of Linguistics•1997

  • Syntactic and semantic identity in Korean sluicing

    Open Access•J B Kim•Lingua•2015

  • Les syntagmes conjoints et leurs fonctions syntaxiques

    Alexis Abeille, Anne Abeillé•Langages•2005

  • Gapping Is Not (VP-) Ellipsis

    Kyle Johnson•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • Stripping and Topless Complements

    Susi Wurmbrand•Linguistic Inquiry•2017

  • Empirical constraints on accounts of Too

    Open Access•Grégoire Winterstein, Henk Zeevat•Lingua•2012

  • The semantics of sluicing

    Open Access•Scott Anderboi, Scott AnderBois•Language•2014

  • The Santa Cruz sluicing data set

    Open Access•Pranav Anand, Daniel Hardt et al.•Language•2021

  • The short answer

    Open Access•Pauline Jacobson•Language•2016

  • Obligatory too in English

    Jeff Kaplan•Language•1984

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2023 - 2025 (3)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae