Expertise in/of co-Creation
The Care Work of Citizen Participation
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 20360752 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sarah R Davies (0000-0002-2113-9103, University of Vienna, autor de correspondencia), Ariadne Avkıran (0009-0001-6382-8863, University of Vienna) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 45 |
| Número | 1-2 |
| Páginas | 3-13 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Bulletin of Science Technology & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0270-4676 • E-ISSN: 1552-4183 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/02704676251353100 |
| OpenAlex | W4411730001 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 49 |
Recent years have seen substantial interest in, and experiments with, public participation in environmental and scientific research and decision-making. In this paper we explore a case of such citizen participation, a co-creation project that aimed to bring together citizens, researchers, and artists to bring about sustainable futures. Drawing on recent theories of the nature of expertise, we argue for the importance of understanding it as involving practices of care, attachment, and affect. In investigating how expertise is performed and negotiated within this case, we find that expertise is distributed across the project, including in the work of organising it. This organisational work, in particular, often involves engagement with the moral imperatives of participation and with embodied and relational skills necessary to it. The analysis thus contributes to discussion of the ways in which different forms of expertise may be present in citizen participation in science, and to understanding the kinds of skills that are necessary for successfully supporting such participation
Business · Citizen science · Co-Creation · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Engineering · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Marketing
Rethinking Expertise
Testing the concept of academic housework in a European setting
Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy
Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?
Ethnography in/of the World System
Expert knowledge and decision-making in controversy contexts
Science shops
Public engagement coming of age
The new genetics and health
A Network Model of Expertise
Participatory Paradoxes
Do-It-Yourself Democracy
Why should we promote public engagement with science
Consulting citizens
Powers of Freedom
Innovating innovation policy
Co-creation in support of responsible research and innovation
Responsible epistemic innovation
RRI legacies
Actionable knowledge and the art of engagement
A research protocol for studying participatory processes in the use of evidence in child welfare systems
Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology
Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology
Remaking Participation
Breaking Bad with the Participatory Turn? Accelerating Time and Intensifying Value in Participatory Experiments
Nothing to do with the science’
Innovating public participation methods
The Third Wave of Science Studies
Politics at a distance
Machineries for Making Publics
Public Deliberation and Governance
From Deliberation to Production
The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies
Science on Stage
Matters of care in technoscience
Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk
Buckets of Resistance
Deliberating Competence
Environmental Risk, Uncertainty, and Participation
On Expertise
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research
The advent of the citizen expert
Citizen experts in participatory governance
How to make sense of citizen expertise in participatory projects
Warriors against the 'War on Drugs
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |