Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Religious Group Autonomy

Further Reflections about what is at Stake

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20385331
AutoresKathleen A Brady (0000-0002-5963-2294, Emory University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2006
Volumen22
Número1
Páginas153-213
Fecha de publicación2006-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Law and Religion (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0748-0814 • E-ISSN: 2163-3088
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0748081400003246
OpenAlexW1546686619
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas11

Does the First Amendment afford religious organizations special protection when government regulation interferes with their internal activities or affairs? Nearly all scholars would agree that relief is appropriate where government regulation is designed to impede a group's religious mission or otherwise unfairly discriminate against religion, but such cases are rare. The more difficult cases involve neutral, generally applicable laws that are not intended to burden the internal operations of religious groups but, nevertheless, have that effect. Does the First Amendment provide any relief in such situations and, if so, what is the justification for this protection? In Employment Division v. Smith , the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment does not excuse individuals from compliance with neutral, generally applicable laws that burden religious practice. Legislatures may choose to grant relief in such situations, but if they choose not to do so, the First Amendment does not require any special accommodations or exemptions. However, Smith did not address protections for religious groups, and, indeed, the Court has never directly addressed the scope of First Amendment protections where neutral government regulation interferes with the internal operations of religious organizations. Scholars who have debated this question have advocated a variety of positions

Autonomy · Democracy · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Religious identity · Sociology · Status quo · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal Cases and Commentary · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes

  • Church Autonomy is not a Better Path to “Truth”

    Open Access•Marci A Hamilton•Journal of Law and Religion•2006

  • Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism

    Richard Rorty•The Journal of Philosophy•1983

  • Membership and Morals

    Nancy L Rosenblum•Membership and Morals•1998

  • The Idea of Public Reason Revisited

    John Rawls, John F Rawls•The University of Chicago Law…•1997

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,05
Intervalo de citas2006 - 2006 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae