Neuroscience explanations really do satisfy
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seductive allure of neuroscience
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 20403239 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Elizabeth M Bennett (0000-0003-2727-9091, Pennsylvania Western University), Peter Mclaughlin (0000-0002-8011-642X, Pennsylvania Western University) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 33 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 290-307 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Public Understanding of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0963-6625 • E-ISSN: 1361-6609 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/09636625231205005 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 57 |
Extraneous neuroscience information improves ratings of scientific explanations, and affects mock juror decisions in many studies, but others have yielded little to no effect. To establish the magnitude of this effect, we conducted a random-effects meta-analysis using 60 experiments from 28 publications. We found a mild but highly significant effect, with substantial heterogeneity. Planned subgroup analyses revealed that within-subjects studies, where people can compare the same material with and without neuroscience, and those using text, have stronger effects than between-subjects designs, and studies using brain image stimuli. We serendipitously found that effect sizes were stronger on outcomes of evaluating satisfaction or metacomprehension, compared with jury verdicts or assessments of convincingness. In conclusion, there is more than one type of neuroscience explanations effect. Irrelevant neuroscience does have a seductive allure, especially on self-appraised satisfaction and understanding, and when presented as text
A review of neurological support for universal design for learning
Lay perceptions of psychology
Dissecting neuromyths in education
AI-powered peer review needs human supervision
Love is in the soul, math is in the brain
Gendering the Menstrual Cycle in Behavioral Neuroendocrinology
Seeking the Category
How laypeople evaluate scientific explanations containing jargon
Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta‐Essentials
Neuromarketing
Seeing is believing
The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
The seductive allure effect extends from neuroscientific to psychoanalytic explanations among Turkish medical students
Can neuroimaging prove pain and suffering
How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of the evidence
Making sense of research on the neuroimage bias
Does television reflect the evolution of scientific knowledge? The case of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder coverage on French television
Persuasive images in popular science
The true “me”—Mind or body
Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense
Effects of behavioral genetic evidence on perceptions of criminal responsibility and appropriate punishment
How the Public Engages With Brain Optimization
Extending the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations effect to popular articles about educational topics
Contemporary neuroscience in the media
Media representations of early human development
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |