Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Does Weighting Capture What's Important? Revisiting Subjective Importance Weighting with a Quality of Life Measure

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2060086
AutoresLara B Russell (0000-0003-1163-2989, University of British Columbia), Anita M Hubley (0000-0001-6172-6305, University of British Columbia), Anita Palepu (0000-0002-7881-4800, St. Paul's Hospital), Bruno D Zumbo (0000-0003-2885-5724, University of British Columbia)
Año2006
Volumen75
Número1
Páginas141-167
Fecha de publicación2006-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocial Indicators Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0303-8300 • E-ISSN: 1573-0921
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11205-004-2528-5
OpenAlexW2008236937
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas34
Referencias citadas40

Correlation · Data mining · Econometrics · Geography · Life satisfaction · Linear discriminant analysis · Measure (data warehouse · Public health · Quality (philosophy · Quality of life (healthcare · Quality of Life Research · Regression · Scale (ratio · Statistics · Weighting · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Mathematics · Medicine · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Importance Weighting in Subjective Well-Being Measures

    Open Access•Akinori Kitsuki, Shunsuke Managi•Journal of Happiness Studies•2023

  • Exploring factors related to agreement between importance and satisfaction of subjective well-being indicators

    Open Access•Tsung-Chi Cheng, Chao‐Yin Lin et al.•Quality & Quantity•2023

  • Problem određivanja složenih (objektivnih i subjektivnih) indeksa kao cjelovitih mjera kvalitete života

    Open Access•Lana Slavuj Borčić, Lana Slavuj•Sociologija i Prostor•2014

  • Validity of Importance Weighting in Subjective Well-Being Research

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Qiguang Li•Journal of Applied Social Science•2020

  • Quality of life in urologic cancer patients

    Open Access•Katja Leuteritz, Diana Richter et al.•Quality of Life Research•2021

  • The relative importance of key life domains for people with disability

    Open Access•Samia Badji, Dennis Petrie et al.•Quality of Life Research•2025

  • Beyond Multiplication

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Research on Social Work Practice•2013

  • Incorporating Perceived Importance of Service Elements Into Client Satisfaction Measures

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Research on Social Work Practice•2011

  • The value of literacy practices

    Lucio Esposito, Bereket Kebede et al.•Compare A Journal of Comparative…•2014

  • Health, Quality of Homecare Services and Quality of Life

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2016

  • Importance Weighting in Client Satisfaction Measures

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2017

  • Incorporating Importance Weights to Measure the Subjective Wellbeing of People with Disability? A Comparison of Several Aggregation Methods

    Open Access•Samia Badji, Dennis Petrie et al.•Social Indicators Research•2026

  • An alternative measure of social wellbeing

    Open Access•Paul Boreham, Jenny Povey et al.•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2013

  • Perceived Importance of Service Elements in Client Satisfaction Measures

    Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Journal of Social Service Research•2012

  • Subjective Well-being and Domain-specific Satisfaction

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh•CAM•2026

  • Testing importance weighting

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh•International Social Science…•2024

  • The development of a new multi-faceted model of social wellbeing

    Open Access•Jenny Povey, Paul Boreham et al.•Journal of Sociology•2016

  • The often overlooked issue of statistical power

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Science Research•2015

  • A Comparison of Normalized and Non-Normalized Multiplicative Subjective Importance Weighting in Quality of Life Measurement

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Qiguang Li et al.•Social Indicators Research•2020

  • Importance of Health and Relative Importance of Satisfaction with One's Own Health

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2019

  • Domain Importance in Subjective Well-Being Measures

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2016

  • Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2014

  • Satisfied Residents in Different Types of Local Areas

    Open Access•Rod Mccrea, Tung-Kai Shyy et al.•Social Indicators Research•2014

  • The Latent Profiles of Life Domain Importance and Satisfaction in a Quality of Life Scale

    Open Access•Su‐kuang Chen, Su-Kuang Chen et al.•Social Indicators Research•2014

  • On the Predictive Effect of Multidimensional Importance-Weighted Quality of Life Scores on Overall Subjective Well-Being

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu et al.•Social Indicators Research•2014

  • Issues in Evaluating Importance Weighting in Quality of Life Measures

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2013

  • Importance is Not Unimportant

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2012

  • Should We Give Up Domain Importance Weighting in QoL Measures

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2012

  • Validation of the WeDQoL-Goals-Thailand Measure

    Open Access•Alison Woodcock, L Camfield et al.•Social Indicators Research•2009

  • Investigating Importance Weighting of Satisfaction Scores from a Formative Model with Partial Least Squares Analysis

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu et al.•Social Indicators Research•2009

  • Relationships Between Population Density and the Perceived Quality of Neighbourhood

    Open Access•Darren Walton, J Murray et al.•Social Indicators Research•2008

  • Can We Weight Satisfaction Score with Importance Ranks Across Life Domains

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu•Social Indicators Research•2008

  • Examining the appropriateness of importance weighting on satisfaction score from range-of-affect hypothesis

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu•Social Indicators Research•2007

  • Examining the relationship between global and domain measures of quality of life by three factor structure models

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu et al.•Social Indicators Research•2007

  • Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Theories of Subjective Well-Being

    Open Access•Bruce Headey, Ruut Veenhoven et al.•Citation classics from 'Social…•2005

  • Social Indicators of Well-Being

    Open Access•Frank M Andrews, Stephen Bassett Withey•Social Indicators of Well-Being•1976

  • Theory of mental tests.

    Harold Gulliksen•1950

  • Society and the Adolescent Self-Image

    Morris Rosenberg•Society and the Adolescent…•1965

  • Sociological Methodology

    Robert Leone•Journal of Marketing Research•1979

  • A Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Quality-of-Life Measurements

    Thomas M Gill•JAMA•1994

  • A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.

    Douglas P Crowne, David Marlowe•Journal of Consulting Psychology•1960

  • The Satisfaction With Life Scale

    Ed Diener, Robert A Emmons et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•1985

  • Validity Studies the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale (Comqol)

    Open Access•Robert A Cummins, Matthew P Mccabe et al.•Educational and Psychological…•1994

  • The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment

    Open Access•Sylvia J T Jansen, J T Jansen et al.•Quality of Life Research•2000

  • Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains

    Open Access•John Browne, John P Browne et al.•Quality of Life Research•1997

  • Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement

    Open Access•Tom Trauer, Andrew Mackinnon•Quality of Life Research•2001

  • The Quality of American Life

    Richard M Cohn, Angus Campbell et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1977

  • Contributions to Global Self-Esteem

    Open Access•Richard F Farmer, LaRita L Jarvis et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2001

  • Influence of individual and group identity salience in the global self-esteem of youth

    Dean R Hoge, John D Mccarthy•Journal of Personality and Social…•1984

  • Global self-esteem

    Herbert W Marsh•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Work Values and Job Rewards

    A L Kalleberg•American Sociological Review•1977

  • Conventional wisdom on measurement

    K A Bollen, Kenneth Bollen et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix

    James H Steiger•Psychological Bulletin•1980

  • Estimating coefficients in linear models

    Howard Wainer•Psychological Bulletin•1976

  • Subjective well-being

    Ed Diener•Psychological Bulletin•1984

  • The Quality of American Life

    Robert Boguslaw, Angus Campbell et al.•Social Forces•1977

  • To Weight or not to Weight

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2004

  • Counting Importance

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2003

  • Multiplicative and additive models of job and life satisfaction

    Open Access•A Mastekaasa•Social Indicators Research•1984

  • Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being

    Open Access•Bruce Headey, Ruut Veenhoven et al.•Social Indicators Research•1991

Obras citantes distintas34
Citas por año1,79
Intervalo de citas2007 - 2026 (20)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 34
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae