Universal Welfare by 'Other Means'? Social Tax Expenditures and the Australian Dual Welfare State

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2115206
AutoresAdam Stebbing (0000-0003-3476-2436, Macquarie University), Ben Spies-Butcher (0000-0002-0427-5082, Macquarie University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2010
Volumen39
Número4
Páginas585-606
Fecha de publicación2010-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Social Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0047-2794 • E-ISSN: 1469-7823
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0047279410000267
OpenAlexW2141121802
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas32
Referencias citadas30

International debates about the comparative institutional structures of welfare states have focused on social expenditure and the inclusiveness of social policy. However, these debates have not accounted for the significant rise of fiscal welfare and, in particular, social tax expenditures (STEs) in our understanding of welfare regimes. The growth of STEs has been particularly significant in Australia. While there has been recognition that STEs contribute to a second tier of welfare provision in some policy domains, there has been no systematic attempt to account for them within the institutional structure of the Australian welfare state. In this article, we chart the rise of STEs, the reasons for their growth in the Australian political economy and conceive of them as forming a second institutional layer of a dual welfare state. We conclude by suggesting that this analysis has broader implications for other, particularly liberal, welfare regimes

Economics · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Social policy · Social Welfare · State (computer science) · Welfare · Welfare state · Employment and Welfare Studies · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies