Civility, Community Cohesion and Antisocial Behaviour

Policy and Social Harmony

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2115458
AutoresJon Bannister (0000-0002-1350-510X, University of Glasgow), Anthony O’sullivan (0000-0002-2244-330X, University of Glasgow), Anthony O''Sullivan, Anthony O'Sullivan
Año2013
Volumen42
Número1
Páginas91-110
Fecha de publicación2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Social Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0047-2794 • E-ISSN: 1469-7823
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0047279412000736
OpenAlexW2156667035
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11
Referencias citadas30

Intergroup conflict, whether manifest as the absence of community cohesion or as the presence of antisocial behaviour, is an issue of international concern. In the UK, confronting the reality or perceived threat of intergroup conflict is a core feature of community cohesion and antisocial behaviour policies. To varying degrees, the frameworks underpinning these policies see the absence or breakdown of community relations as a cause of social disharmony. A key challenge for policy is therefore improvement of the quality of community relations. In this paper, we consider how government has approached this challenge. We filter our analysis through the lens of civility, which proposes that the peaceful coexistence of diverse social groups rests on the existence and maintenance of intergroup empathy and mutual respect. This proposal is supported by international research evidence on the outcomes of meaningful interactions, where these are predicated on equal group status, leading to changes in group and intergroup perceptions and behaviours (the contact hypothesis). We consider the extent to which community cohesion and anti-social behaviour policies in the UK demonstrate a coherent conception of the problem of community relations, the quality of community relations to which these policies aspire and whether the strategies deployed to address community relations seek to support civility through meaningful interaction. We find that the policy debates start from different presumptions concerning the roots of social disharmony, and this is reflected in the nature of the interventions which the community cohesion and antisocial behaviour policy frameworks support. In particular, we find that the social interaction promoted through policies in the UK is not necessarily aimed at achieving social harmony through meaningful interaction based on recognition of equal group status. We also show that these policies are based on little in the way of evidence and prior knowledge

Civility · Cohesion (chemistry) · Community cohesion · Group cohesiveness · Harmony (color) · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social relation · Sociology · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology