Does having an Indigenous Political Party in Government make a Difference to Social Policy? The Māori Party in New Zealand
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2115874 |
|---|---|
| Autores | L Humpage (0000-0002-8572-4918, University of Auckland, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 46 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 475-494 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-07-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Social Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0047-2794 • E-ISSN: 1469-7823 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0047279417000022 |
| OpenAlex | W2579940656 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
| Referencias citadas | 10 |
Indigenous Māori in New Zealand have had significant opportunities to influence mainstream politics and policy since 2008 when the Māori Party began negotiating supply and confidence agreements with the conservative National Party in return for progress on Māori Party initiatives. This article assesses whether the Māori Party has made a difference in social policy. It argues that the holistic, whole-family-focused Whānau Ora strategy and initiatives aiming to revitalise the Māori language are significant policy innovations that uniquely embed Māori cultural values and governance into mainstream policy frameworks. A Ministerial Committee on Poverty, established as a result of National-Māori Party negotiations, put Māori politicians at the decision-making table and led to some important housing and health initiatives but fewer gains are evident regarding income/employment policies that address the disproportionate material disadvantage of Māori. Ultimately, the Māori Party has provoked policy innovation and there is some evidence of improving Māori outcomes. But political constraints inhibit opportunities for significant and lasting recognition of indigenous rights and radically improved socio-economic outcomes in the social policy arena
Disadvantage · Economic growth · Economics · Government (linguistics) · Indigenous · Mainstream · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Sociology · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Law · Public Administration · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Does a Payment-for-Outcomes Model Improve Indigenous Wellbeing? Commissioning Agencies and Social Impact Bonds in New Zealand
Why are Indigenous Affairs Policies Framed in ways that Undermine Indigenous Health and Equity
A Call to (Caring) Arms
Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage
Public policy and indigenous language rights
Identifying how the principles of self-determination could be applied to create effective alcohol policy for First Nations Australians
Mode de scrutin, représentation des autochtones dans les institutions parlementaires et décolonisation
The complexity of convergence
Is Indigeneity like Ethnicity? Theorizing and Assessing Models of Indigenous Political Representation
Tikanga and New Zealand political parties-heading in the "right" direction? case study-2020 General Election
‘Troubled families’, ‘troublesome families’ and the trouble with Payment by Results
Fast Policy
Gaps in Indigenous disadvantage not closing
New Labour's Big Idea
An ‘inclusive’ society
Troubled Families’ Programme in England
Globalisation, neo-liberalism and the struggle for indigenous citizenship
Framing Privatisation in the English National Health Service
| Citas por año | 1,11 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2017 - 2024 (8) |
| Altamente citado | No |