Attitudinal, Normative, and Resource Factors Affecting Communication Scholars’ Data Sharing
A Replication Study
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21225259 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jinghong Xu (0000-0003-4654-0603, Beijing Normal University), Rukun Zhang (0000-0002-6987-9311, Beijing Normal University) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 12 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-03-28 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Media and Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2183-2439 • E-ISSN: 2183-2439 |
| Editorial | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/mac.7666 |
| OpenAlex | W4393262095 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 34 |
This study explores the factors affecting communication scholars’ data-sharing intentions, a critical component of reproducibility and replicability in open science. We replicate Harper and Kim’s (2018) study, which employs the theory of planned behavior to demonstrate the impacts of attitudinal, normative, and resource factors. Specifically, their original research examines data-sharing practices among psychologists, and our replication aims to reinforce their findings within the communication field. Data from a survey of Chinese communication scholars ( N = 351) are analyzed using structural equation modeling. The findings indicate that perceived benefit and perceived risk significantly influence the attitudes of communication scholars towards sharing their data, positively and negatively, respectively. Additionally, attitudes, subjective norms, journal pressure, and the conditions facilitating data sharing have a significant positive impact on communication scholars’ behavioral intentions. Perceived effort inversely affects attitudes toward data sharing but does not impact behavioral intentions. This study provides a theoretical framework for understanding data-sharing intentions and behaviors in the open science movement. The role of this research as a replication study serves as a compelling demonstration of scientific inquiry. Practical suggestions, such as fostering open dialog, institutional incentives, and cooperation between different actors to increase communication scholars’ data-sharing intentions, and recommendations for carrying out replication and reproduction studies, are discussed. Finally, we judiciously reflect on the methodological limitations of our research and highlight directions for future research on open science
Behavioural sciences · Data sharing · Dialog box · Economics · Incentive · Normative · Normative social influence · Open Science · Political science · Scholarly communication · Social science · Sociology · Survey data collection · Theory of planned behavior · World Wide Web · Big Data and Business Intelligence · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Computer Science · Data Quality and Management · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Between Innovation and Standardization
The Adoption of Open Science Practices in Communication Research
Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research
Moral Intensity and Ideologies in Forming Moral Reasoning Strategies and Negative Word of Mouth Toward Controversial Social Media Influencers
The Value of Direct Replication
Understanding Information Technology Usage
Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing
The theory of planned behavior
User Acceptance of Information Technology
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Decolonizing Open Science
Opening a Conversation on Open Communication Research
Towards an Inclusive Agenda of Open Science for Communication Research
Opening up Data, Tools, and Practices
Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries
Increasing clarity where it is needed most
How communication scholars see open scholarship
Open Communication Science
Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research
Perceived Benefits, Harms, and Views About How to Share Data Responsibly
Open Science
| Citas por año | 2 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Altamente citado | No |