Urban infrastructure is not a tree
Integrating and decentralizing urban infrastructure systems
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21247853 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sybil Derrible (0000-0002-2939-6016, University of Illinois Chicago, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 44 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 553-569 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-05-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2399-8083 • E-ISSN: 2399-8091 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0265813516647063 |
| OpenAlex | W2380207918 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
In his original 1965 article, Christopher Alexander argued that master planned cities ultimately failed because the designs elaborated followed a tree structure as opposed to a more desirable semilattice structure present in organic cities. In this article, I argue that a similar claim can be made with urban infrastructure systems planning. As cities expanded and became increasingly complex in the 20th century, the responsibility to plan and design urban infrastructure was distributed to separate agencies that seldom communicate and coordinate with one another. In the global context to make cities more sustainable and resilient, a better integration of infrastructure systems may hold much potential. After recalling Alexander’s main concepts, I examine how current infrastructure systems are naturally interdependent. I then discuss the role of integration, by notably proposing an integration-decentralization matrix, with four quadrants, illustrated by using practical examples. The quadrants are current paradigm, siloed distribution, localized integration, and integrated decentralization. Overall, a better integration of urban infrastructure can offer significant benefits to a city, and it may be time to seriously revisit our current urban infrastructure systems planning practice
Business · Civil engineering · Decentralization · Environmental planning · Geography · Interdependence · Political science · Regional science · Urban planning · Engineering · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Smart Cities and Technologies · Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Fostering inter-sectorial integration
A comparative analysis of underground and bus transit networks through graph theory
Planning decentralized urban renewable energy systems using algal cultivation for closed-loop and resilient communities
Interrelationships between electricity, gas, and water consumption in large‐scale buildings
The role of travel demand and network centrality on the connectivity and resilience of an urban street system
Seeing the invisible
The city in history
Flood risk and climate change
Systems integration for global sustainability
Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
Evolution of Public Supply Water Withdrawal in the USA
The Changing Metabolism of Cities
Electricity generation and cooling water use
The Structure and Dynamics of Networks
Understanding and enhancing future infrastructure resiliency
| Citas por año | 0,86 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2024 (6) |
| Altamente citado | No |