Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

What support is needed for preconception health improvement, and by whom? A qualitative study of women's views

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21258316
AutoresMichael P Daly (0000-0001-6694-3835, University of Bristol, autor de correspondencia), Ruth Kipping (0000-0002-5446-8077, University of Bristol), Ruth R Kipping, James White (0000-0001-8371-8453, Cardiff University), James Matthew White (0000-0002-4549-9381), Julia Sanders (0000-0001-5712-9989, Cardiff University)
Año2025
Volumen8
Páginas100607
Fecha de publicación2025-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSSM - Qualitative Research in Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2667-3215 • E-ISSN: 2667-3215
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100607
OpenAlexW4412464702
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas42

Background Systematic reviews suggest preconception health interventions may be effective in improving maternal and infant outcomes . However, few studies have explored women’s views on the types of support required for preconception health improvement, nor when and to whom this support should be provided. Methods We purposively sampled women aged 18-48 years in the West of England from respondents to a survey, and conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews to explore their views on support needs in the preconception period and target populations for this support. We analyzed the data using a data-driven framework analysis. Results The women we interviewed (N=20) broadly supported promoting greater awareness of preconception health and felt the limited focus on health before pregnancy downplays its importance relative to antenatal health. Some women opposed support services and structural interventions to improve preconception health, due to concerns these are less impactful than encouraging individual responsibility for health. Women who supported structural interventions highlighted broader determinants of health and socioeconomic barriers to preconception health improvement. Men were considered a key target population for preconception support, to help share the burden for preconception health improvement. Women broadly supported ‘age-appropriate’, school-based preconception health education, highlighting young women as an under-served group in need of additional preconception education. Conclusion Our findings indicate a need to deliver early preventive support ahead of first pregnancy through services, interventions and policies co-produced with women and women’s partners. Future research should explore how to increase public understanding of the socioeconomic, environmental and commercial determinants of preconception health

Obstetrics · Qualitative research · Sociology · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Health disparities and outcomes · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • Miscarriage matters

    Open Access•Siobhan Quenby, Ioannis D Gallos et al.•The Lancet•2021

  • The effect of obesity prevention interventions according to socioeconomic position

    Open Access•Alison Beauchamp, K Backholer et al.•Obesity Reviews•2014

  • Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency

    Open Access•Jean Adams, O T Mytton et al.•PLoS Medicine•2016

  • Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours

    Open Access•Stephanie Diepeveen, Tom Ling et al.•BMC Public Health•2013

  • Prevalence of Obesity and Trends in the Distribution of Body Mass Index Among US Adults, 1999-2010

    Katherine M Flegal, Margaret D Carroll et al.•JAMA•2012

  • Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

    Open Access•Nicola Gale, Nicola K Gale et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2013

  • Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016

    Open Access•Regina Guthold, G A Stevens et al.•The Lancet Global Health•2018

  • But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba•New Directions for Program…•1986

  • Women’s views on content and delivery methods for interventions to improve preconception health

    Open Access•Michael P Daly, Ruth Kipping et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•Qualitative Psychology•2022

  • Improving the uptake of preconception care and periconceptional folate supplementation

    Open Access•Danielle Mazza, Anna Chapman•BMC Public Health•2010

  • What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews

    Theo Lorenc, Mark Petticrew et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2013

  • Research methods ‐‐ researching peers and familiar settings

    J Hockey•Research Papers in Education•1993

  • A Framework for Public Health Action

    Thomas R Frieden•American Journal of Public Health•2010

  • Impact on Social Inequalities of Population Strategies of Prevention for Folate Intake in Women of Childbearing Age

    Nureen Sumar, Lindsay Mclaren•American Journal of Public Health•2011

  • Trusting nudges? Lessons from an international survey

    Open Access•Cass R Sunstein, Lucia A Reisch et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2019

  • Role of socialization in explaining social inequalities in health

    Open Access•Archana Singh-Manoux, Michael Marmot•Social Science & Medicine•2005

  • Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems

    Open Access•Nicole Bergen, Ronald Labonté•Qualitative Health Research•2020

  • Lifecourse influences on women's smoking before, during and after pregnancy

    Open Access•Hilary Graham, Summer Sherburne Hawkin et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2010

  • Now I see it, now I don't

    Open Access•Roni Berger•Qualitative Research•2015

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae