Lutheran Ecotheology and the Anthropocene

Posthumanism, Apocalypse, and Hope

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21311643
AutoresNazila Heidarzadegan (0000-0003-1238-7903, Independent Researcher Karabuk Turkiye, autor de correspondencia)
Año2025
Volumen64
Número4
Páginas211-218
Fecha de publicación2025-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDialog (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0012-2033 • E-ISSN: 1540-6385
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/dial.70012
OpenAlexW4415884985
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas22

This article explores how Lutheran theology can enrich ecological thought in the Anthropocene era. Building on the Lutheran view of the human as both righteous and flawed ( simul justus et peccator ) and the logic of sola gratia (grace alone), it reframes ecological crisis not as a failure of faith but as a kairotic moment demanding ethical and spiritual rethinking. Instead of portraying humanity as separate or exceptional, the article aligns Lutheran anthropology with posthumanist theorists such as Donna Haraway, N. Katherine Hayles, and Rosi Braidotti, emphasizing humanity's creaturely vulnerability and relational existence. In this context, apocalyptic themes in Lutheran and modern theology are considered not as endings but as openings for ongoing ecological and spiritual renewal. The article proposes an ethic grounded in humility, lament, and vocation, one shaped by grace and attuned to the fragility of the planet. By doing so, Lutheran thought offers resources for articulating hope and responsibility in the face of environmental crisis. Ultimately, this reframing positions Lutheran theology as a guide for creative engagement and ethical response in an era marked by planetary unce and transformation

Anthropocene · Cognitive reframing · Dignity · Ecological crisis · Environmental crisis · Face (sociological concept) · Faith · Humanity · Vulnerability (computing) · Historical Legal Studies and Society · Reformed Theology and Governance · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics