Reflecting on diachronic Dutch books
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21364041 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael Rescorla (0000-0003-1064-9113, Department of Philosophy University of California Los Angeles, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 57 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 511-538 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Noûs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0029-4624 • E-ISSN: 1468-0068 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/nous.12409 |
| OpenAlex | W4220964770 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 38 |
Conditionalization governs how to reallocate credence in light of new evidence. One prominent argument in favor of Conditionalization holds that an agent who violates it is vulnerable to a diachronic Dutch book : a series of acceptable bets offered at multiple times that inflict a sure loss. van Fraassen argues that an agent who violates the Principle of Reflection is likewise vulnerable to a diachronic Dutch book. He concludes that agents should conform to both Conditionalization and Reflection. Some authors reply that Reflection is implausible and hence that there must be something wrong with diachronic Dutch book arguments. Other authors try to isolate a principled difference between the Dutch book argument for Conditionalization and the Dutch book argument for Reflection, such that the former argument may succeed even though the latter fails. I pursue a version of this strategy. I contend that, once we properly elucidate the notion of sure loss , non‐reflectors are not vulnerable to a sure loss. An agent who violates Reflection is not thereby subject to a diachronic Dutch book. Appearances to the contrary result from an unmotivated focus upon an overly narrow set of gambling scenarios
Argument (complex analysis) · Biology · Credence · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Reflection (computer programming) · Set (abstract data type) · Subject (documents) · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
CHAPTER 7 Dutch Book Arguments
Belief and the Will
Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model
Outline of a Theory of Truth
An Improved Dutch Book Theorem for Conditionalization
I Believe It, But Soon I'll Not Believe It Any More
Epistemic Possibility
Conditionalization and observation
On the proper formulation of conditionalization
Higher Order Probabilities and Coherence
Dynamic Coherence and Probability Kinematics
Diachronic Dutch Book Arguments
Distorted Reflection
Rational Probabilistic Incoherence
The Unreliability of Naive Introspection
Is Introspective Knowledge Incorrigible
Knowledge of Our Own Beliefs
Bayesianism I
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |