Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Reflecting on diachronic Dutch books

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21364041
AutoresMichael Rescorla (0000-0003-1064-9113, Department of Philosophy University of California Los Angeles, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen57
Número3
Páginas511-538
Fecha de publicación2023-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaNoûs (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0029-4624 • E-ISSN: 1468-0068
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/nous.12409
OpenAlexW4220964770
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas38

Conditionalization governs how to reallocate credence in light of new evidence. One prominent argument in favor of Conditionalization holds that an agent who violates it is vulnerable to a diachronic Dutch book : a series of acceptable bets offered at multiple times that inflict a sure loss. van Fraassen argues that an agent who violates the Principle of Reflection is likewise vulnerable to a diachronic Dutch book. He concludes that agents should conform to both Conditionalization and Reflection. Some authors reply that Reflection is implausible and hence that there must be something wrong with diachronic Dutch book arguments. Other authors try to isolate a principled difference between the Dutch book argument for Conditionalization and the Dutch book argument for Reflection, such that the former argument may succeed even though the latter fails. I pursue a version of this strategy. I contend that, once we properly elucidate the notion of sure loss , non‐reflectors are not vulnerable to a sure loss. An agent who violates Reflection is not thereby subject to a diachronic Dutch book. Appearances to the contrary result from an unmotivated focus upon an overly narrow set of gambling scenarios

Argument (complex analysis) · Biology · Credence · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Reflection (computer programming) · Set (abstract data type) · Subject (documents) · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Reflection and conditionalization

    Open Access•Bas C Van Fraassen•Noûs•2023

  • Reflection, introspection, and book

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Kevin Dorst•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025

  • CHAPTER 7 Dutch Book Arguments

    Alan Hajek•The Oxford handbook of rational…•2009

  • Belief and the Will

    C van Fraassen•The Journal of Philosophy•1984

  • Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model

    Open Access•John C Harsanyi•Management Science•1967

  • Outline of a Theory of Truth

    Saul A Kripke, Saul Kripke•The Journal of Philosophy•1975

  • An Improved Dutch Book Theorem for Conditionalization

    Open Access•Michael Rescorla•Erkenntnis•2022

  • I Believe It, But Soon I'll Not Believe It Any More

    Open Access•John M Vickers•Synthese•2000

  • Epistemic Possibility

    Open Access•Michael Huemer•Synthese•2007

  • Conditionalization and observation

    Open Access•Paul Teller•Synthese•1973

  • On the proper formulation of conditionalization

    Open Access•Michael Rescorla•Synthese•2021

  • Higher Order Probabilities and Coherence

    Open Access•Soshichi Uchii•Philosophy of Science•1973

  • Dynamic Coherence and Probability Kinematics

    Open Access•Brian Skyrms•Philosophy of Science•1987

  • Diachronic Dutch Book Arguments

    Anna Mahtani•The Philosophical Review•2012

  • Distorted Reflection

    Rachael Briggs•The Philosophical Review•2009

  • Rational Probabilistic Incoherence

    Michael Caie•The Philosophical Review•2013

  • The Unreliability of Naive Introspection

    Eric Schwitzgebel•The Philosophical Review•2008

  • Is Introspective Knowledge Incorrigible

    D M Armstrong•The Philosophical Review•1963

  • Knowledge of Our Own Beliefs

    Open Access•Sherrilyn Roush•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • Bayesianism I

    Open Access•Kenny Easwaran•Philosophy Compass•2011

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,67
Intervalo de citas2023 - 2025 (3)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae