Genre and Conversation
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21364064 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Elmar Unnsteinsson (0000-0001-5333-1784, School of Philosophy University College Dublin Dublin Ireland, autor de correspondencia), Daniel W Harris (0000-0002-4764-3703, Department of Philosophy Hunter College and the CUNY Graduate Center New York USA) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-01-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Noûs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0029-4624 • E-ISSN: 1468-0068 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/nous.70035 |
| OpenAlex | W7125832758 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 70 |
Conversations can belong to different types, or genres . We consider four dimensions of variation as case studies: Some conversations are about sharing information, others about making decisions; some are about making firm commitments, others about brainstorming options; some are about sticking to the facts, others involve make‐believe; some are highly cooperative, others adversarial. These are orthogonal dimensions of variation which explain why some kinds of speech acts are more felicitous and expected than others in particular conversations. But what are genres, how do they shape conversation, and why do they exist? We argue that genre categories can be understood as types of conversation plans, which are the structures of intentions that we use to organize conversations, and that each of our four genre distinctions corresponds to an independently variable kind of element within these plans. Speakers are under rational pressure to make their communicative intentions cohere with the conversation plan, which gives their interlocutors a powerful extralinguistic resource for interpreting their speech acts. We use this idea to show how several influential pragmatic theories, including Grice's theory of conversational implicature, Stalnaker's theory of common ground, and Roberts' question‐under‐discussion model, can be generalized to account for more kinds of conversation
Brainstorming · Conversation · Conversation analysis · Element (criminal law) · Preference · Variation (astronomy) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
The Interactive Stance
Interpreting Imperatives
Shared Agency
Using Language
The Nature of Fiction
Context
Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse
Defaults in update semantics
Presuppositions
Epistemic Modals
Responding to indirect speech acts
Rationality Through Reasoning
Language without information exchange
Million dollar questions
Language games and their types
Scientific conclusions need not be accurate, justified, or believed by their authors
Conversational Cooperation Revisited
Imperative inference and practical rationality
Fictional force
This paper might change your mind
Authentic Speech and Insincerity
Intention and commitment in speech acts
Talking with the Doctor, 1
Just Words
Planning, Time, and Self-Governance
What ifs
Alternatives and attention in language and reasoning
Questions Under Discussion
Information structure in discourse
Question‐directed Attitudes
The Grice Is Right
What we know and what to do
Science, assertion, and the common ground
The force of fictional discourse
Pragmatics
Meaning
Utterer's Meaning and Intention
Shared Cooperative Activity
Knowing and Asserting
Coherence and Incoherence
Intention and Convention in Speech Acts
The Structure of Open Secrets
Pragmatic Particularism
Extracted Speech
Sports announcer talk
On the sequential organization and genre-orientation of discourse units in interaction
Works of Fiction and Illocutionary Acts
Common Ground
The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse
Risk, Responsibility, and Blame
Towards a taxonomy of conversational discourse types
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |