Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Genre and Conversation

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21364064
AutoresElmar Unnsteinsson (0000-0001-5333-1784, School of Philosophy University College Dublin Dublin Ireland, autor de correspondencia), Daniel W Harris (0000-0002-4764-3703, Department of Philosophy Hunter College and the CUNY Graduate Center New York USA)
Año2026
Fecha de publicación2026-01-26
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaNoûs (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0029-4624 • E-ISSN: 1468-0068
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/nous.70035
OpenAlexW7125832758
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas70

Conversations can belong to different types, or genres . We consider four dimensions of variation as case studies: Some conversations are about sharing information, others about making decisions; some are about making firm commitments, others about brainstorming options; some are about sticking to the facts, others involve make‐believe; some are highly cooperative, others adversarial. These are orthogonal dimensions of variation which explain why some kinds of speech acts are more felicitous and expected than others in particular conversations. But what are genres, how do they shape conversation, and why do they exist? We argue that genre categories can be understood as types of conversation plans, which are the structures of intentions that we use to organize conversations, and that each of our four genre distinctions corresponds to an independently variable kind of element within these plans. Speakers are under rational pressure to make their communicative intentions cohere with the conversation plan, which gives their interlocutors a powerful extralinguistic resource for interpreting their speech acts. We use this idea to show how several influential pragmatic theories, including Grice's theory of conversational implicature, Stalnaker's theory of common ground, and Roberts' question‐under‐discussion model, can be generalized to account for more kinds of conversation

Brainstorming · Conversation · Conversation analysis · Element (criminal law) · Preference · Variation (astronomy) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Speech Genres and Other Late Essays

    M M Bakhtin, Caryl Emerson et al.•Speech Genres and Other Late Essays•1986

  • The Interactive Stance

    Jonathan Ginzburg•The interactive stance•2012

  • Interpreting Imperatives

    Open Access•Magdalena Kaufmann•Interpreting Imperatives•2012

  • Shared Agency

    Michael E Bratman•Shared Agency•2014

  • Using Language

    Open Access•Herbert H Clark•Using Language•1996

  • The Nature of Fiction

    Open Access•Gregory Currie•Nature of Fiction•1990

  • Context

    Robert Stalnaker•Context•2014

  • Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse

    Open Access•Craige Roberts•Linguistics and Philosophy•1989

  • Defaults in update semantics

    Open Access•Frank Veltman•Journal of Philosophical Logic•1996

  • Presuppositions

    Open Access•Robert Stalnaker•Journal of Philosophical Logic•1973

  • Epistemic Modals

    Seth Yalcin•Mind•2007

  • Responding to indirect speech acts

    Open Access•Herbert H Clark•Cognitive Psychology•1979

  • Rationality Through Reasoning

    Open Access•Ernest Sosa, John Broome•Rationality Through Reasoning•2013

  • Language without information exchange

    Open Access•Jessica Keiser•Mind & Language•2022

  • Million dollar questions

    Open Access•Daniel Hoek, R Bradley•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • Language games and their types

    Open Access•Jonathan Ginzburg, Kwong-Cheong Wong•Linguistics and Philosophy•2024

  • Scientific conclusions need not be accurate, justified, or believed by their authors

    Open Access•Haixin Dang, Liam Kofi Bright•Synthese•2021

  • Conversational Cooperation Revisited

    Open Access•Gretchen Ellefson•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • Imperative inference and practical rationality

    Open Access•Daniel W Harris•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Fictional force

    Open Access•Andreas Stokke•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • This paper might change your mind

    Open Access•Josh Dever, Herbert I Schiller•Noûs•2021

  • Authentic Speech and Insincerity

    Elmar Unnsteinsson, Journal Of Philosophy Inc•The Journal of Philosophy•2023

  • Intention and commitment in speech acts

    Daniel W Harris•Theoretical Linguistics•2019

  • Talking with the Doctor, 1

    Open Access•Malcolm Coulthard, Margaret Ashby•Journal of Communication•1975

  • Just Words

    Mary Kate Mcgowan•Just Words•2019

  • Planning, Time, and Self-Governance

    Michael E Bratman•Planning, Time, and Self-Governance•2018

  • What ifs

    Open Access•Justin Bledin, Kyle Rawlins•Semantics and Pragmatics•2019

  • Alternatives and attention in language and reasoning

    Open Access•Nadine Bade, Léo Picat et al.•Semantics and Pragmatics•2022

  • Questions Under Discussion

    Dan Beaver, Craige Roberts et al.•Annual Review of Linguistics•2016

  • Information structure in discourse

    Open Access•Craige Roberts•Semantics and Pragmatics•2012

  • Question‐directed Attitudes

    Open Access•Jane Friedman•Philosophical Perspectives•2013

  • The Grice Is Right

    Open Access•Sam Berstler•Philosophical Perspectives•2024

  • What we know and what to do

    Open Access•Nate Charlow•Synthese•2013

  • Science, assertion, and the common ground

    Open Access•Corey Dethier•Synthese•2022

  • The force of fictional discourse

    Open Access•Karl Gustav Bergman, Nils Franzén•Synthese•2022

  • Pragmatics

    Open Access•Robert Stalnaker, Robert C Stalnaker•Synthese•1970

  • Meaning

    H P Grice•The Philosophical Review•1957

  • Utterer's Meaning and Intention

    H P Grice•The Philosophical Review•1969

  • Shared Cooperative Activity

    Michael E Bratman•The Philosophical Review•1992

  • Knowing and Asserting

    T Williamson•The Philosophical Review•1996

  • Coherence and Incoherence

    Daniel Fogal, Olle Risberg•The Philosophical Review•2025

  • Intention and Convention in Speech Acts

    P F Strawson•The Philosophical Review•1964

  • The Structure of Open Secrets

    Sam Berstler•The Philosophical Review•2025

  • Pragmatic Particularism

    Open Access•Ray Buchanan, Herbert I Schiller•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2021

  • Extracted Speech

    Rachel Ann McKinney•Social Theory and Practice•2016

  • Sports announcer talk

    Open Access•Charles A Ferguson•Language in Society•1983

  • On the sequential organization and genre-orientation of discourse units in interaction

    Open Access•Uta Quasthoff, Uta Μ Quasthoff et al.•Discourse Studies•2017

  • Works of Fiction and Illocutionary Acts

    Gregory Currie•Philosophy and literature•1986

  • Common Ground

    Open Access•Robert Stalnaker•Linguistics and Philosophy•2002

  • The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse

    John R Searle•New Literary History•1975

  • Risk, Responsibility, and Blame

    Open Access•Karen Bickerstaff, Gordon Walker•Environment and Planning A…•2002

  • Towards a taxonomy of conversational discourse types

    Open Access•Douglas Biber, Jamie Egbert et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2021

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae