The Form of Agency

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21364087
AutoresWilliam Hornett (0000-0002-3053-9424, The University of Cambridge Cambridge UK, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Fecha de publicación2026-04-10
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaNoûs (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0029-4624 • E-ISSN: 1468-0068
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/nous.70044
OpenAlexW7153250682
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas76

Philosophers often think agency is essentially connected with rationality, intention, or control. However, Minimalists argue that agency is just the power to cause a change; acids and boulders are agents too. Many philosophers treat Minimalism as a wild outlier, assuming its falsity without argument. My paper has three main aims: first, to show that Minimalism is actually an incredibly plausible theory; second, to show that it is false; and third, to defend an alternative theory of agency. I begin by providing a new argument for thinking that Minimalism is attractive as the default view of agency. I then argue that despite this attraction it is wrong, and I use it as a foil to defend my own view that agency is the distinctively animal power of discretion. I do this by first arguing for Deflationism about refraining, and then showing that this supports an argument for thinking that agency is a kind of two‐way power. Finally, I show how to arbitrate disputes about the extent of agency, as well as arguing that, if I am right about agency's nature, then it is prevalent throughout the animal kingdom

Agency (philosophy) · Argument (complex analysis) · Falsity · Minimalism (technical communication) · Power (physics) · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy and Theoretical Science