Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Aksjologiczno-prawna analiza plebiscytowego modelu budżetu partycypacyjnego (obywatelskiego) na przykładzie wybranych polskich miast

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21390741
AutoresUrszula Kinga Zawadzka-Pąk (0000-0002-3774-4295, University of Białystok, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen82
Número1
Páginas283-298
Fecha de publicación2020-03-30
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaRuch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0035-9629 • E-ISSN: 2543-9170
EditorialAdam Mickiewicz University Poznan (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.14746/rpeis.2020.82.1.19
OpenAlexW3125095208
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas4

The purpose of this article is to conduct an axiological and legal analysis of the most popular model of participatory (civic) budgeting in Poland (the plebiscite model). According to the adopted hypothesis, some legal and practical solutions concerning the plebiscite model strengthen public values, while others weaken them. In the research, the combination of three coherent methods was used: (i) a literature analysis, (ii) the dogmatic and legal method, and (iii) interviews conducted with municipal officials responsible for the organization of participatory budgeting (PB), municipal councillors and residents (BP participants). The research covers six Polish cities: Sopot, Gdańsk, Białystok, Kraków, Opole and Warsaw. The axiological and legal analysis of the principles and mode of BP was made using a catalogue of nodal public values, namely values with a significant number of related values (including: human dignity, sustainability, citizen involvement, openness, secrecy, compromise, integrity, and robustness). The research leads to the conclusion that the plebiscite BP in Poland is not axiologically neutral, its principles and mode have both a positive and negative impact on particular nodal public values. The scale of negative impact is definitely greater than the scale of the positive one, although, obviously, the assessment in this respect, even if supported by arguments and scientific analysis, will always remain at least partly subjective

Cartography · Citizen journalism · Dignity · Geography · Openness to experience · Political science · Robustness (evolution) · Scale (ratio) · Law · Local Governance and Planning · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Polish Law and Legal System · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology

  • The Oxford Handbook of Governance

    Dāwid Lēwî-Faur, David Levi-Faur•Oxford handbook of governance•2012

  • Public Values

    Open Access•Torben Beck Jørgensen, Barry Bozeman•Administration & Society•2007

  • Defining and Achieving Normative Democratic Values in Participatory Budgeting Processes

    Open Access•Doralyn Rossmann, Elizabeth A Shanahan•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation

    Open Access•Kaifeng Yang, Sanjay K Pandey•Public Administration Review•2011

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae