Personality and context‐related factors of helping and helping‐related affect during early stages of the Covid ‐19 pandemic
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21391758 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Bojana Bodroža (0000-0003-4165-0678, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy University of Novi Sad Novi Sad Serbia, autor de correspondencia), Bojana M Dinić (0000-0002-5492-2188, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy University of Novi Sad Novi Sad Serbia) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 64 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 89-98 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/sjop.12857 |
| PMID | 35796288 |
| OpenAlex | W4284884064 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 34 |
COVID‐19 pandemic led to introduction of lockdown measures in many countries, while in Serbia the Government also introduced the curfew by which vulnerable groups of citizens were prohibited from leaving their homes at any time. In such a situation many citizens organized to voluntarily offer their help to those in isolation, which offered a unique opportunity to examine prosocial behavior in the natural setting of global crisis. This study examined the differences between non‐helpers and helpers, as well as groups of helpers who provided their help to close or unknown others, in personality (prosocial tendencies, selfishness and communal narcissism) and context‐related factors (situation specific empathy and fear) of prosocial behaviors. Additionally, the study also analyzed the helping‐related affect among helpers, depending on the recipient of help and personality characteristics. Results revealed that groups of helpers with different recipients of help (close persons, unknown persons or both) were not different among each other, but they were different from non‐helpers. Non‐helpers were more selfish and had self‐focused prosocial tendencies, and they showed less empathy towards people in isolation, compared to helper groups. However, the helping‐related affect depended on the recipient of help and helper's personality traits. This study confirmed some previous findings and offered novel insights into factors related to helping in crises
Affect (linguistics) · Altruism (biology) · Context (archaeology) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Curfew · Developmental psychology · Empathy · Helping behavior · Personality · Prosocial behavior · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Psychology · Social Psychology
Disadvantage and prosocial behavior
Empathy and Moral Development
Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members
Neural Responses to Ingroup and Outgroup Members' Suffering Predict Individual Differences in Costly Helping
Altruism, happiness, and health
Evolutionary Psychology
Identity and Emergency Intervention
When altruists cannot help
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect
The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents
Altruism and egoism
Strategically Controlling Information to Help Friends
Agentic narcissism, communal narcissism, and prosociality
Communal narcissism
Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship
Volunteering and depression
Personality and prosocial behavior
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |