Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

A systematic review of measurement uncertainty visualizations in the context of standardized assessments

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21391764
AutoresAleksander Heltne (0000-0002-3524-203X, Department of Research and Innovation, Clinic for Mental Health and Addiction Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway), Niek Frans (0000-0001-6684-0684, Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands), Benjamin Hummelen (0000-0002-8717-8076, Department of Research and Innovation, Clinic for Mental Health and Addiction Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway), Erik Falkum (0000-0001-9791-3284, Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway), Sara Germans Selvik (0000-0001-9921-8971, Department of Psychiatry, Helse Nord‐Trønderlag Namsos Hospital Namsos Norway), Muirne C S Paap (0000-0002-1173-7070, Department of Research and Innovation, Clinic for Mental Health and Addiction Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway)
Año2023
Volumen64
Número5
Páginas595-608
Fecha de publicación2023-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaScandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjop.12918
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas54

This systematic review summarized findings of 29 studies evaluating visual presentation formats appropriate for communicating measurement uncertainty associated with standardized clinical assessment instruments. Studies were identified through systematic searches of multiple databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, ERIC, Scopus, and Web of Science). Strikingly, we found no studies which were conducted using samples of clinicians and included clinical decision‐making scenarios. Included studies did however find that providing participants with information about measurement uncertainty may increase awareness of uncertainty and promote more optimal decision making. Formats which visualize the shape of the underlying probability distribution were found to promote more accurate probability estimation and appropriate interpretations of the underlying probability distribution shape. However, participants in the included studies did not seem to benefit from the additional information provided by such plots during decision‐making tasks. Further explorations into how presentations of measurement uncertainty impact clinical decision making are needed to examine whether findings of the included studies generalize to clinician populations. This review provides an important overview of pitfalls associated with formats commonly used to communicate measurement uncertainty in clinical assessment instruments, and a potential starting point for further explorations into promising alternatives. Finally, our review offers specific recommendations on how remaining research questions might be addressed

  • The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

    Open Access•Julian P T Higgins, D G Altman et al.•BMJ•2011

  • Extensional versus intuitive reasoning

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Psychological Review•1983

  • Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science

    Open Access•Anne Marthe Van Der Bles, Sander Van Der Linden et al.•Royal Society Open Science•2019

  • Psychological testing and psychological assessment

    Gregory J Meyer, Stephen E Finn et al.•American Psychologist•2001

  • Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

    Open Access•Mourad Ouzzani, Hossam Hammady et al.•Systematic Reviews•2016

  • A perspective on judgment and choice

    Daniel Kahneman•American Psychologist•2003

  • Confidence Intervals Make a Difference

    Open Access•Rink Hoekstra, Addie Johnson et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2012

  • Measurement versus prediction in the construction of patient-reported outcome questionnaires

    Open Access•Niels Smits, L Andries Van Der Ark et al.•Quality of Life Research•2017

  • Evaluating the effect of visually represented geodata uncertainty on decision-making

    Christoph Kinkeldey, Alan M Maceachren et al.•Cartography and Geographic…•2015

  • The effect of communication design and recipients’ numeracy on responses to UXO risk

    W Bruine De Bruin, Eric R Stone et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2013

  • Decision Making in Information-Rich Environments

    Nicholas H Lurie•Journal of Consumer Research•2004

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae