Construction and validation of a scale for assessing critical social justice attitudes
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21391901 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Oskari Lahtinen (0000-0002-8589-5370, INVEST Flagship/Department of Psychology University of Turku Turku Finland, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 65 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 693-705 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-08-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/sjop.13018 |
| PMID | 38482728 |
| OpenAlex | W4392811556 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 21 |
Two large studies (combined n = 5,878) set out to construct and validate a scale for assessing critical social justice attitudes. Studies assessed the reliability, factor structure, model fit, and both convergent and divergent validity of the scale. Studies also examined the prevalence of critical social justice attitudes in different populations and the scale's correlations with other variables of interest, including well‐being variables: anxiety, depression, and happiness. Participants for Study 1 ( n = 848) were university faculty and students, as well as non‐academic adults, from Finland. Participants responded to a survey about critical social justice attitudes. Twenty one candidate items were devised for an initial item pool, on which factor analyses were conducted, resulting in a 10‐item pilot version of critical social justice attitude scales (CSJAS). Participants for Study 2 were a nationwide sample ( n = 5,030) aged 15–84 from Finland. Five new candidate items were introduced, of which two were included in the final, seven‐item, version of CSJAS. The final CSJAS scale had high reliability ( α = 0.87, ω = 0.88) and a good model fit (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.04, standardized root mean residual [SRMR] = 0.01, χ 2 (14, 5024) = 132.8 ( p d = 1.20). In both studies, CSJAS was correlated with depression, anxiety, and (lack of) happiness, but not more so than being on the political left was. The critical social justice attitude scale was successfully constructed and validated. It had good reliability and model fit
Anxiety · Construct validity · Convergent validity · Economic Justice · Happiness · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Scale (ratio) · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Clinical Psychology · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Mathematics · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Kun woke-sota Suomeen tuli
The Intersection of social justice and left-wing political beliefs, antisemitism, and perceptions of Israelis and Palestinians
Reconsidering the ideological happiness gap
Two Kinds of “Woke”? Psychometric Validation of the Critical Right Scale and Revised Critical Social Justice Attitudes Scale
Retracted
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Racial microaggressions in everyday life
Who's Afraid of Critical Race Theory?
Land of Woke and Glory? The Conceptualisation and Framing of “Wokeness” in UK Media and Public Discourses
The politics of depression
‘I use any pronouns, and I’m questioning everything else’
From Cultural Exchange to Transculturation
White Fragility
Is everyone really equal? An introduction to key concepts in social justice education
No Grand Pronouncements Here
Mapping the Margins
Depression and political predispositions
A Black Feminist Statement
| Citas por año | 2,5 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Altamente citado | No |