The link between cognitive and affective empathy and interpersonal emotion regulation direction and strategies
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21391964 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gabriel Chavira Trujillo (0000-0001-9918-1822, Epidemiology Department National Institute of Cardiology “Ignacio Chávez” Ciudad de México Mexico), María Gallego Tomás (Department of Psychology Liverpool Hope University Liverpool UK), Belén Lopéz-Pérez (0000-0002-8517-2236, Liverpool Hope University, autor de correspondencia), Belén López‐pérez (Department of Psychology Liverpool Hope University Liverpool UK) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 63 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 594-600 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-12-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/sjop.12847 |
| PMID | 35698828 |
| OpenAlex | W4282841800 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 44 |
Interpersonal emotion regulation (ER) refers to the different processes aimed at changing the emotional states of others. Some authors have speculated about the pivotal role of empathy for interpersonal ER to happen. However, the very limited empirical evidence suggests that only cognitive empathy as opposed to affective empathy may be a necessary antecedent. As previous research only considered interpersonal affect improvement and showed mixed evidence for the regulation strategies, we aimed to address this gap in the current research. To that aim, 374 adults ( M = 30.3 years, 249 female) reported their tendency to engage in cognitive (perspective‐taking) and affective empathy (empathic concern and personal distress) as well as their tendency to improve and worsen others' mood, and to use different regulation strategies (situation modification, attention deployment, cognitive change, and modulation of the emotional response) to change others' feelings. Results of the regression analyses showed that while affect improvement was not significantly predicted by any of the empathy variables, affect worsening was positively predicted by personal distress. Concerning the regulation strategies, while cognitive change and situation modification were positively predicted by personal distress, attention deployment was positively predicted by perspective‐taking. Overall, the obtained results highlight the need to further investigate the link between empathy and ER and to carefully consider the methods selected for that purpose
Affect (linguistics) · Cognition · Cognitive reappraisal · Developmental psychology · Distress · Empathic concern · Empathy · Feeling · Interpersonal communication · Mood · Personal distress · Perspective (graphical) · Perspective-taking · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Emotional Intelligence and Performance · Empathy and Medical Education · Psychology · Social Psychology
Emotion dynamics
Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?
When are adaptive strategies most predictive of psychopathology?
Integrating Empathy and Interpersonal Emotion Regulation
Interpersonal emotion regulation as a mechanism of social support in depression
The Social Neuroscience of Empathy
G*Power 3
Emotion regulation
Coronashaming
Distress and Empathy
Distract or reappraise? Age-related differences in emotion-regulation choice
Interpersonal emotion regulation
Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion
A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies
Cheering my friends up
Taking time seriously
Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes
Measuring individual differences in empathy
Should I just listen to you or change your mind too? Target's perceived efficacy of agents' interpersonal affect improvement strategies
| Citas por año | 0,25 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Altamente citado | No |