Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Politics of Interdictive Jurisprudence

Interrogative Practices and Psychological Evaluations (Gemütszustandsuntersuchungen) in the Adjudication of Civil Interdiction Cases before Berlin’s District Courts (1877–1914)

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21392435
AutoresEric J Engstrom (0000-0002-8235-3867, Cal Poly Humboldt, autor de correspondencia)
Año2025
Volumen33
Número4
Páginas397-426
Fecha de publicación2025-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaNTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0036-6978 • E-ISSN: 1420-9144
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00048-025-00430-8
PMID41123657
OpenAlexW4415438977
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas17

The article investigates the psychological evaluations (so-called Gemütszustandsuntersuchungen ) that were used in legal interdiction proceedings at Berlin’s district courts in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The evaluations were undertaken in order to help judges decide whether or not individuals—usually, but not always feeble-minded or mentally ill ones—should be placed under legal guardianship. The following themes are addressed: the evolving procedural statutes that governed the exercise of judicial discretion and the presentation of scientific evidence; the collaborative interaction of judges and forensic experts during the interrogations; the instability of written transcripts and recourse to bodily and behavioral attributes in the face of interrogative failure; and the heated political exchanges about the psy-disciplines and their role in the abrogation or abridgment of citizens’ rights in Wilhelmine Berlin. The article will first survey the specific statutory context that framed guardianship cases in Berlin’s district court ( Amtsgericht ). It will then summarize contemporary debates about reforms to procedural law and the administrative adjudication of those cases. Against this backdrop, the analysis will then turn to an examination of court transcripts of the interrogations in order to assess the practice and often contested standing of psy-experts in the courtrooms of Wilhelmine Berlin

Adjudication · Adversarial system · Context (archaeology) · Discretion · Interrogative · Judicial opinion · Legal guardian · Politics · Statute · Statutory law · Historical and Scientific Studies · Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · Medical History and Research

  • About the concept of the “dangerous individual” in 19th-century legal psychiatry

    Open Access•Michel Foucault, Alain Baudot et al.•International Journal of Law and…•1978

  • Death in the Tiergarten

    Open Access•Benjamin Carter Hett, Hilde Bruch•Anorexia nervosa•2004

  • Verbrechensbekämpfung im Anstaltsstaat

    Christian Müller•Verbrechensbekämpfung im…•2004

  • Teaching psychology to jurists

    Annette Mülberger•History of Psychology•2009

  • Forensic Psychology in Germany

    Heather Wolffram•Forensic Psychology in Germany•2018

  • The Mellage Trial and the Politics of Insane Asylums in Wilhelmine Germany

    Ann Goldberg•The Journal of Modern History•2002

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae