Conceptualizing community scientific literacy
Results from a systematic literature review and a Delphi method survey of experts
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21392635 |
|---|---|
| Autores | K C Busch (0000-0002-4549-5401, Department of STEM Education North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA), Aparajita Rajwade (Department of STEM Education North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 108 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 1231-1268 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21871 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 69 |
The predominant conceptualization of scientific literacy occurs on the micro scale of an individual person. However, scientific literacy can also be exhibited at the meso scale by groups of people in communities of place, practice, or interest. What comprises this community level scientific literacy (CSL) is both understudied and undertheorized. In this paper, we utilized a systematic literature review to describe how CSL is characterized in the extant literature and a Delphi survey of experts to elicit more current thought. Guided by cultural‐historical activity theory, inductive and deductive analyses produced seven elements of CSL and their constituent characteristics: (1) resources, (2) attributes of those resources, (3) actors, (4) interactions between actors, (5) contexts, (6) topics, and (7) purposes. The typology created through this process is meant to be generative, serving as a starting point for continuing refinement within science education and other fields related to science learning and knowing
Rethinking Scientific Literacy
Salvaging science literacy
Science Education
Collective symbolic coping with new technology
“Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”
eHealth Literacy
Scientific literacy for citizenship
Science education as/for participation in the community
How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Scientific literacy as collective praxis
“It just goes against the grain.” Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK
The order of discourse in surveys of public understanding of science
The contribution of museums to scientific literacy
Ocean Literacy to Promote Sustainable Development Goals and Agenda 2030 in Coastal Communities
Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation
Disruptive moments as opportunities towards justice‐oriented pedagogical practice in Informal Science Learning
Science at the supermarket
Toward a manifesto for the ‘public understanding of big data’
Analyzing acceptance politics
Understanding “understanding” in Public Understanding of Science
Use of the deficit model in a shared culture of argumentation
‘It is not entirely healthy.’ A qualitative study into public appraisals of uncertain risks of chemical substances in food
Beyond Public Perceptions of Gene Technology
Framing ‘fracking’
Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences
A Successful Experiment in Participatory Science for Promoting Change in a French Industrial Region
Educating for citizenship
Developing a Curriculum for Change
Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences
What is community-level environmental literacy, and how can we measure it? A report of a convening to conceptualize and operationalize CLEL
Do They Know What They Read? Building a Scientific Literacy Measurement Instrument Based on Science Media Coverage
Leveraging collective action and environmental literacy to address complex sustainability challenges
Science Mass Communication
Student empowerment in an environmental science classroom
The Public Understanding of Science-A Rhetorical Invention
Introduction
The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis
Disentangling the Exposure Experience
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |