Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Moral Difference and Moral Differences

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21394680
AutoresCraig Taylor (0000-0002-7186-2674, Flinders University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen62
Número4
Páginas619-630
Fecha de publicación2023-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSophia (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0038-1527 • E-ISSN: 1873-930X
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11841-023-00954-3
OpenAlexW4360985127
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas6

The idea that human beings have a distinct moral worth—a moral significance over and above any moral worth, such as that may be, possessed by other animals—has a long history and has traditionally been taken for granted by philosophers and theologians. However, in a variety of quarters in recent philosophy, this idea has come into disrepute, seeming to indicate a mere prejudice in favour of our own species. For example, Peter Singer has argued that such a position is mere speciesism, a prejudice of a kind with racism and sexism in that it involves making moral distinctions between our own and other species that cannot be morally justified. What on such views is needed to justify any such distinction is a difference in terms of the morally relevant properties possessed by our own species as compared with other species. I will call this view the moral property view. Insofar as other species share with us morally relevant properties, for example the capacity to suffer cognitive ability and so on, it is mere prejudice not to accept moral requirements with respect to them as we do with respect to our own species. While on the surface such a view may seem morally enlightened, it indicates what will seem to many problematic moral judgments with respect to severely disabled human beings. In this paper, I will respond to these concerns by suggesting a different basis for the idea of human moral distinctiveness, one that draws on recent work by Wittgensteinian moral philosophers and which denies what I called above the property view. According to this view, while our shared life with other animals involves the recognition of their moral significance, our shared life with other human beings involves recognising that human beings as human beings have a distinctive moral value

Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Moral authority · Moral disengagement · Moral psychology · Morality · Optimal distinctiveness theory · Prejudice (legal term) · Social cognitive theory of morality · Sociology · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Human Priority and Reasonable Partiality

    Open Access•Yuxian Zhang•Journal of Agricultural and…•2026

  • The Idea of Human Distinctiveness

    Open Access•Gorazd Andrejč•Sophia•2023

  • Created from Animals

    James Rachels•Created from animals•1990

  • At the Margins of Moral Personhood

    Eva Feder Kittay•Ethics•2005

  • Bernard Williams on the Human Prejudice

    Open Access•Cora Diamond•Philosophical Investigations•2018

  • Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline

    Bernard Williams, A W Moore•Philosophy As a Humanistic…•2006

  • Inside Ethics

    Alice Crary•Inside Ethics•2016

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,67
Intervalo de citas2023 - 2026 (4)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae