How Not to Diversify Philosophy of Religion
A Critique from the Twenty-First Century
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21394844 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rafal K Stepien (0000-0001-9294-9552, Austrian Academy of Sciences, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 62 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 739-746 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Sophia (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0038-1527 • E-ISSN: 1873-930X |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11841-024-01007-z |
| PMID | 38544904 |
| OpenAlex | W4392512882 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
Philosophy of religion has been the object of penetrating critiques concerning its continued near-complete blindness to all but a single religion. The need for philosophy of religion to open up so as to include more than merely occasional and tokenistic treatments of ‘Other’ religions is clearly evident from the slew of recently published titles concerned with diversifying the field. In this light, a book such as Victoria Harrison’s Eastern Philosophy of Religion should surely come as a welcome addition. And yet, unfortunately, this book turns out to be a case study in how not to diversify philosophy of religion in the twenty-first century
Epistemology · Philosophy of religion · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious studies · Study and Philosophy of Religion
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |