Divine Gütigkeit, Divine Güte
Kant on an Ancient Query
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21394914 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Amit Kravitz (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 60 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 349-363 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Sophia (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0038-1527 • E-ISSN: 1873-930X |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11841-021-00825-9 |
| OpenAlex | W3135142766 |
| Idioma | DE |
| Referencias citadas | 13 |
In his essay on theodicy, Kant explicitly claims that while the disproportion between crime and punishment poses a theodicean challenge concerning God’s justice, the suffering of the righteous is compatible with God’s justice [Gerechtigkeit], goodness [Gütigkeit], and holiness [Heiligkeit]. In light of this, Kant’s reason for addressing the book of Job in this context is puzzling. However, the location of Job’s story in the text reveals that Job’s suffering is rendered relevant only concerning the relation between two of God’s moral attributes: goodness as subordinated to holiness, i.e., God’s benevolence [Güte]. Implications concern the difference between ‘authentic’ and ‘doctrinal’ theodicy
Context (archaeology) · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Philosophy of religion · Political science · Punishment (psychology) · Relation (database) · Theodicy · Theology · History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity · Religious studies · Social Psychology · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |