Industry 5.0 technologies to enable innovation in the era of twin transition
A case study on the nexus between SMEs and regulators
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21404449 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Roberto Cerchione (0000-0002-7025-3295, Parthenope University of Naples, autor de correspondencia), Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli (0000-0002-6852-5167), Armando Papa (0000-0001-7084-6763, National Research University Higher School of Economics), Viviana Sicardi (0009-0000-2743-7606, Parthenope University of Naples) |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 109 |
This article examines how regulators can guide the safe and effective adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain (BC), and brain computer interfaces (BCI), considered as the pivotal 5.0 human-centric enabling technologies. Although prior research recognises regulators as influential actors within innovation systems, limited empirical evidence explains how regulatory expectations are translated into everyday organisational practices, particularly within resource-constrained small and medium enterprises (SMEs). To address this gap, the study employs an exploratory approach by adopting a qualitative case-study design of an SME currently integrating 5.0 enabling technologies into its operational activities to pursue twin transition. Data were collected through a combination of semi-structured interviews and secondary data to provide an in-depth investigation. The findings were analysed and coded through the lenses of institutional and dynamic capabilities theory. The results show that regulatory actors shape organisational adoption of 5.0 technologies by establishing conditions of stability, directionality, legitimacy, and formation that influence how an SME interprets regulatory signals, structures decision-making routines, and develops human and technological capabilities. By highlighting the formative role of regulation in shaping skills development and governance arrangements, this article contributes to research on regulation and innovation by conceptualising regulators as active participants in the co-construction of human-centric innovation systems. The findings offer theoretical insights into regulation as a decision science and provide practical implications for policymakers seeking to support twin transition in resource-constrained organisational contexts
Emerging technologies · Industry 4.0 · Nexus (standard) · Digital Transformation in Industry · Economic Development and Digital Transformation · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems — An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector
What passes as a rigorous case study?
Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China
The Foundations of Enterprise Performance
How Actors Change Institutions
Developing a unified definition of digital transformation
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
How does artificial intelligence adoption shape employee performance? A novel exploration of mimetic artificial intelligence performance through a hybrid approach based on PLS-SEM and ANN
Technology foresight for social good
Gamification and e-learning for young learners
Mapping public perception of artificial intelligence
Uncertainty management in global innovation ecosystems
Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives
Regulatory review of new product innovation
Procedural choices in regulatory science
The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector
The impact of digitalization on entrepreneurial activity and sustainable competitiveness
Using thematic analysis in psychology
The AI-policy-governance nexus
Human-centered AI
Modes of regulatory governance
The Iron Cage Revisited
Protection without Capture
| Altamente citado | No |
|---|