Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Industry 5.0 technologies to enable innovation in the era of twin transition

A case study on the nexus between SMEs and regulators

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21404449
AutoresRoberto Cerchione (0000-0002-7025-3295, Parthenope University of Naples, autor de correspondencia), Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli (0000-0002-6852-5167), Armando Papa (0000-0001-7084-6763, National Research University Higher School of Economics), Viviana Sicardi (0009-0000-2743-7606, Parthenope University of Naples)
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas109

This article examines how regulators can guide the safe and effective adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain (BC), and brain computer interfaces (BCI), considered as the pivotal 5.0 human-centric enabling technologies. Although prior research recognises regulators as influential actors within innovation systems, limited empirical evidence explains how regulatory expectations are translated into everyday organisational practices, particularly within resource-constrained small and medium enterprises (SMEs). To address this gap, the study employs an exploratory approach by adopting a qualitative case-study design of an SME currently integrating 5.0 enabling technologies into its operational activities to pursue twin transition. Data were collected through a combination of semi-structured interviews and secondary data to provide an in-depth investigation. The findings were analysed and coded through the lenses of institutional and dynamic capabilities theory. The results show that regulatory actors shape organisational adoption of 5.0 technologies by establishing conditions of stability, directionality, legitimacy, and formation that influence how an SME interprets regulatory signals, structures decision-making routines, and develops human and technological capabilities. By highlighting the formative role of regulation in shaping skills development and governance arrangements, this article contributes to research on regulation and innovation by conceptualising regulators as active participants in the co-construction of human-centric innovation systems. The findings offer theoretical insights into regulation as a decision science and provide practical implications for policymakers seeking to support twin transition in resource-constrained organisational contexts

Emerging technologies · Industry 4.0 · Nexus (standard) · Digital Transformation in Industry · Economic Development and Digital Transformation · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models

  • The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems — An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector

    Open Access•Lea Fuenfschilling, Bernhard Truffer•Technological Forecasting and…•2016

  • What passes as a rigorous case study?

    Open Access•Michael Gibbert, Winfried Ruigrok et al.•Strategic Management Journal•2008

  • Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China

    Open Access•Xiongfeng Pan, Bowei Ai et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2019

  • The Foundations of Enterprise Performance

    David J Teece•Academy of Management Perspectives•2014

  • How Actors Change Institutions

    J Battilana, Bernard Leca et al.•Academy of Management Annals•2009

  • Developing a unified definition of digital transformation

    Open Access•Cheng Gong, Vincent Ribiere•Technovation•2021

  • Building Theories from Case Study Research

    Kathleen M Eisenhardt•Academy of Management Review•1989

  • Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research

    Open Access•Dennis A Gioia, Kevin G Corley et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2013

  • How does artificial intelligence adoption shape employee performance? A novel exploration of mimetic artificial intelligence performance through a hybrid approach based on PLS-SEM and ANN

    Open Access•Shengmin Liu, Yu Mei•Technological Forecasting and…•2026

  • Technology foresight for social good

    Open Access•C X Mao, Caixia Mao et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Gamification and e-learning for young learners

    Open Access•Aditya Behl, Abhishek Behl et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Mapping public perception of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Philipp Brauner, Felix Glawe et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2025

  • Uncertainty management in global innovation ecosystems

    Open Access•Leonardo Augusto De Vasconcelos Gomes, Matheus Graciani dos Santos et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives

    Open Access•Lina Linde, David Sjödin et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Regulatory review of new product innovation

    Open Access•Derrick Boakye, David Sarpong et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Procedural choices in regulatory science

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff•Technology in Society•1995

  • The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector

    Open Access•Pascal D König, Georg Wenzelburger•Technology in Society•2021

  • The impact of digitalization on entrepreneurial activity and sustainable competitiveness

    Open Access•Amal Dabbous, Karine Aoun Barakat et al.•Technology in Society•2023

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • The AI-policy-governance nexus

    Open Access•Cheryl Marie Cordeiro, Laurynas Adomaitis et al.•Technology in Society•2025

  • Human-centered AI

    Open Access•Mir Muhammad Nizamani, Haili Zhang et al.•Technology in Society•2025

  • Modes of regulatory governance

    Open Access•Marco Guidi, Igor Guardiancich et al.•Governance•2020

  • The Iron Cage Revisited

    P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Protection without Capture

    Open Access•Daniel Carpenter, Daniel P Carpenter•American Political Science Review•2004

Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae