Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Sociable robots or focused speakers? Transforming customer experience with communication style and embodiment type in smart home devices adoption

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21452020
AutoresJian Shi (0000-0003-1284-5011, China International Communications Group), Cong Lin (0000-0003-4926-2776, Tsinghua Univeristy), Haocheng Wang (0009-0000-8500-6054, Renmin University of China), Haochen Wang (0009-0009-7136-0955, Renmin University of China), Soyoung Jung (0000-0002-1010-6250, Dong-A University), Na Ta (0000-0001-7095-4262, Renmin University of China, autor de correspondencia), Ruhao Liu (Renmin University of China), Yuxin Gao (0000-0003-3384-7331, Design, University of Toronto), Huajie Cao (0009-0009-0347-3202, Michigan State University)
Año2025
Volumen44
Número14
Páginas3559-3574
Fecha de publicación2025-08-27
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaBehaviour and Information Technology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0144-929X • E-ISSN: 1362-3001
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0144929x.2025.2485401
OpenAlexW4409174463
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas84

The rising demand for AI-powered smart home solutions has produced a recent surge in the adoption of smart home devices (SHDs). SHDs are uniquely situated within private, personal environments, and understanding the impact of device design on users’ parasocial relationship, privacy perceptions, and overall adoption is crucial; however, the literature lacks a satisfactory exploration of this essential facet of integrating intelligent devices into everyday living. This study addresses this deficit by analysing the nuanced interplay between device design features and user adoption intentions. An online experiment was conducted using a 2 (communication style: task-oriented vs. social-oriented) × 3 (embodiment type: application voice vs. virtual animation vs. physical robot) between-subjects design (N = 297). The findings indicate that SHDs employing a social-oriented communication style, while promoting stronger parasocial interactions, are simultaneously correlated with increased perceptions of privacy risk when compared to those utilising a task-oriented communication style. The more embodied the SHDs, the stronger the perceived parasocial interaction. Furthermore, higher perceived privacy risks negatively affect purchase intention. The findings provide novel insights into the design of SHDs that not only address privacy concerns but also create positive user experiences in IoT-based smart homes, thereby fostering long-term adoption

Art · Business · Human–computer interaction · Robot · Style (visual arts) · Visual arts · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence · Communication · Computer Science · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI

  • Modeling understanding through synthetic empathy and the sociotechnical reconfiguration of care

    Open Access•Dani Fadillah, Uspal Jandevi•Social Science Information•2026

  • Embodied conversational agents for collecting patient-reported data

    Open Access•Thure Georg Weimann, Hannes Schlieter et al.•Behaviour and Information…•2026

  • How does a service chatbot build parasocial relationships with customers? A perspective from parasocial interaction theory

    Open Access•Ching-Hua Lu, Chia-Ying Li et al.•Internet Research•2026

  • The History and Scope of Parasocial Research

    Nicole Liebers, Holger Schramm•Oxford Handbook of Parasocial…•2023

  • Effects of reputation and website quality on online consumers' emotion, perceived risk and purchase intention

    Open Access•Jiyoung Kim, Sharron J Lennon•Journal of Research in…•2013

  • The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]

    Open Access•Masahiro Mori, Karl F Macdorman et al.•IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine•2012

  • Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations

    Open Access•William B Dodds, Kent B Monroe et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•1991

  • Should AI-Based, conversational digital assistants employ social- or task-oriented interaction style? A task-competency and reciprocity perspective for older adults

    Open Access•Veena Chattaraman, Wi-Suk Kwon et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2019

  • Building a Stronger Casa

    Open Access•Andrew Gambino, J Fox et al.•Human-Machine Communication•2020

  • Valenced Media Effects on Robot-Related Attitudes and Mental Models

    Open Access•John Picard Stein, Jaime Banks•Human-Machine Communication•2023

  • Useful shortcuts

    Open Access•George Chalhoub, Martin J Kraemer et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • The digital harms of smart home devices

    Open Access•David Buil-Gil, Steven Kemp et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2023

  • Consumer acceptance of voice-activated smart home devices for product information seeking and online ordering

    Open Access•Bonnie Canziani, Sara MacSween•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • “In A.I. we trust?” The effects of parasocial interaction and technopian versus luddite ideological views on chatbot-based customer relationship management in the emerging “feeling economy”

    Open Access•Seounmi Youn, Seung‐a Annie Jin et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Can an intelligent personal assistant (IPA) be your friend? Para-friendship development mechanism between IPAs and their users

    Open Access•Chung‐wha Ki, Chung-Wha Ki et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2020

  • Home IoT resistance

    Open Access•Hwansoo Lee•Telematics and Informatics•2020

  • Users’ Preferences for Smart Home Automation – Investigating Aspects of Privacy and Trust

    Open Access•Eva-Maria Schomakers, Hannah Biermann et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2021

  • The acceptance process of smart homes by users

    D R Nascimento, M P Ciano et al.•Behaviour and Information…•2023

  • Determinants of smart home adoption and differences across technology readiness segments

    Open Access•Birgul Basarir-Ozel, Vesile Aslihan Nasir et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2023

  • No secrets between the two of us

    Open Access•Sohye Lim, Hongjin Shim•Cyberpsychology Journal of…•2022

  • Privacy and Communication

    Judee K Burgoon•Annals of the International…•1982

  • Application of AI and robotics in hospitality sector

    Open Access•Abdul Khaliq, Ali Waqas et al.•Technology in Society•2022

  • Role of embodiment and presence in human perception of robots’ facial cues

    Open Access•Ali Mollahosseini, Hojjat Abdollahi et al.•International Journal of…•2018

  • Two uncanny valleys

    Open Access•Boyoung Kim, Ewart J de Visser et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents

    Open Access•Kwan Min Lee, Younbo Jung et al.•International Journal of…•2006

  • Cheery companions or serious assistants? Role and demeanor congruity as predictors of robot attraction and use intentions among senior citizens

    Open Access•Sundar, S Shyam Sundar et al.•International Journal of…•2016

  • Machines and Mindlessness

    Open Access•Clifford, Clifford Nass et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2000

  • Embodied Conversational Agents

    Nicole C Krämer, Gary Bente et al.•Social Psychology•2009

  • Loneliness, Parasocial Interaction, and Local Television News Viewing

    Open Access•Alan M Rubin, Alan Rubin et al.•Human Communication Research•1985

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año3
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae