Examination of tools associated with the evaluation of knowledge uptake and utilization
A scoping review
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21456941 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jasmin Bhawra (0000-0001-9926-8442, University of Waterloo), Kelly Skinner (0000-0003-0989-8841, University of Waterloo, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 83 |
| Páginas | 101875 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Evaluation and Program Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0149-7189 • E-ISSN: 1873-7870 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101875 |
| PMID | 33011561 |
| OpenAlex | W3087984167 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 85 |
Knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) has become an integral part of organizational practice. Evaluation of KTE, as well as knowledge products generated through this process, is important for understanding the effectiveness of KTE strategies. This scoping review aimed to identify tools and frameworks used to evaluate knowledge uptake and utilization (KUU). The search strategy included review of PubMed and Scopus databases, hand searching of relevant journals, and citation tracing. Over 6500 abstracts were screened; 292 full-text articles were shortlisted by two reviewers. Seventy-two articles described tools for evaluating KUU. A total of 23 tools could be generally applied to knowledge products/processes used in different sectors; 36 evaluation tools were designed for specific knowledge products (i.e., websites); 9 tools were discipline-specific (i.e., medical field), and four articles described evaluations of knowledge products/processes using alternative methods such as Google Analytics or qualitative methods. The majority of tools (n = 40, 56 %) focused on usability of a knowledge product or process. This scoping review identified various tools being used to assess the effectiveness and impact of KTE processes/products, however, the measures were as varied as the projects, and were often not designed to evaluate KTE in particular
Knowledge management · MEDLINE · Process (computing) · Scopus · Usability · Chemistry · Computer Science · Health Education and Validation · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Health Sciences Research and Education
Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
Lost in knowledge translation
Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs
Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire
Mobile App Rating Scale
How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice
Applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate two implementation strategies used to introduce a tool for lifestyle intervention in Swedish primary health care
Supporting quality public and patient engagement in health system organizations
Developing a Tool to Measure Knowledge Exchange Outcomes
Evaluating the Process and Outcomes of a Knowledge Translation Approach to Supporting Use of the Diabetes Population Risk Tool (DPoRT) in Public Health Practice
Evaluation outcomes of a knowledge translation platform
Understanding Dimensions of Organizational Evaluation Capacity
Fostering Voices and Fostering Messages
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions
Levels of Use of the Innovation
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,75 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |