How Are Australian Local Governments Responding to the Homelessness Crisis? Findings From a National Study
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21458561 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Andrew Clarke (0000-0003-1324-8032, School of Social Sciences University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia, autor de correspondencia), John-Patrick Moore (0009-0001-1602-5072, School of Social Sciences University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia), Fatemeh Aminpour (0000-0003-2351-2626, City Futures Research Centre University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia), Katya Eagles (City Futures Research Centre University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-04-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Australian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ajs4.70114 |
| OpenAlex | W7160200391 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 19 |
Australian local governments are facing intensifying pressures to respond to worsening visible homelessness. This paper presents one of the first national studies on how local governments are responding to these pressures, and the first since the onset of the post‐pandemic housing crisis. Drawing on a nationwide survey and three qualitative case studies, we examine the scale of local homelessness pressures, the modes of engagement adopted by councils, and the institutional constraints that shape their capacity to act. The findings show that homelessness is now regarded as a significant issue by most councils, a marked increase from the pre‐pandemic period. Councils' responses cluster around three core functions: surveillance and referral, coordination of fragmented service systems, and facilitation of accommodation and service provision. These functions are part of broader efforts to reorient councils from reactive, fragmented, and enforcement‐dominated interventions toward more proactive, whole‐of‐organisation approaches grounded in collaboration and care. However, these transformations remain fragile, constrained by chronic resource limitations, unclear legislative mandates, and, most significantly, severe shortfalls in affordable housing. The paper argues that while councils play an increasingly important role in local homelessness governance, their efforts cannot be sustained without structural reform and renewed investment from other levels of government
Accommodation · Facilitation · Legislature · Local government · Project commissioning · Psychological intervention · Homelessness and Social Issues · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Social Work Education and Practice
International Perspectives on Local Government and Housing
Increasing the Potential for Gaze, Surveillance and Normalisation
The role of housing policy in perpetuating conditional forms of homelessness support in the era of housing first
Damned if we do, damned if we don't”
The Ambiguities of Homelessness Governance
From ’Rabble Management’ to ’Recovery Management’
Land-use reforms and housing costs
The potential for urban surveillance to help support people who are homeless
Doing What We Can with What We Have”
It's Not Our Responsibility, But We Need to Do Something
Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism
The role and significance of planning in the determination of house prices in Australia
Surveilling the marginalised
Pervasive Penality
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |