Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Folk Ethics of Commodification

An Empirical Investigation into Moral Attitudes Against Market Transactions

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21465387
AutoresSebastian Krügel (0000-0003-1196-8220, University of Hohenheim), Matthias Uhl (0000-0002-8838-4824, University of Hohenheim, autor de correspondencia), Ingo Pies (0000-0003-2068-4529, Wittenberg University)
Año2026
Volumen203
Número1
Páginas181-203
Fecha de publicación2026-01-01
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Business Ethics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0167-4544 • E-ISSN: 1573-0697
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10551-025-06049-y
OpenAlexW4412090851
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas14

Commodification is the process of transforming goods or services traditionally transferred without charge into commercially exchangeable commodities. Critics argue that this transformation often entails the loss of inherent value, rendering the resulting transactions morally problematic. In contrast, proponents of commodification contend that if it is morally acceptable to give something away for free, it should likewise be permissible to transfer it in exchange for money. Despite the extensive academic debate surrounding the moral implications of commodification, there remains a significant lack of empirical research on how laypeople perceive and evaluate this phenomenon. Given that policies supporting or opposing commodification are frequently influenced by public attitudes, addressing this gap is of critical importance. To this end, we conducted four online experiments to systematically examine the folk ethics of commodification. Our findings indicate a pronounced anti-commodification attitude across a range of specific contexts, an attitude that remains robust to several variations. Anti-commodification attitudes in specific contexts, however, erode when people are first asked to reflect on the general legitimacy of commodification. In contrast, their approval of this general legitimacy is weakened when they are first asked to evaluate specific cases. These latter results should sensitize educators that a case-based approach to the moral limits of markets might induce different normative conclusions than a principled approach

Business · Business ethics · Commodification · Economics · Environmental ethics · Market economy · Political science · Positive economics · Quality of Life Research · Sociology · Ethics in Business and Education · Law · Philosophy

  • TurkPrime.com

    Open Access•Leib Litman, Jonathan Robinson et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2017

  • The Fatal Conceit

    F A Hayek, W W Bartley et al.•Fatal Conceit•1988

  • A Theory of Justice

    Open Access•John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1999

  • Market-Inalienability

    Margaret Jane Radin•Harvard Law Review•1987

  • When Goliath sells to David

    Open Access•Johanna Jauernig, Matthias Uhl et al.•Public Choice•2025

  • The myth of the rational voter

    Bryan Caplan, Bryan Douglas Caplan•Myth of the Rational Voter•2007

  • Markets without Symbolic Limits

    Jason Brennan, Peter Jaworski et al.•Ethics•2015

Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae