Justice, Collective Self‐Determination, and the Ethics of Immigration Control

This article brings Gillian Brock and Alex Sager's recently published books into conversation with my book, Immigration and Democracy . It begins with a summary of the main normative arguments of my book to set the stage for critical engagement with Brock and Sager's books. While I agree with Brock's Justice for People on the Move that state power must be justified to both insiders and outsiders, I think she gives too little weight to the value of collective self‐determination. I distinguish between justice and collective self‐determination and argue that each is an important component of legitimacy. Sager's Against Borders focuses on immigration enforcement and contends that violence is inherent in border controls. Every legal system is backed by the threat of the use of force; the question is whether the use of force by state agents is justified. In contrast to Sager, I argue that the proper response to the injustices of current immigration enforcement is reform, not abolition, of the immigration system

Criminology · Economic Justice · Economics · Immigration · Political science · Sociology · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration

• Immigration enforcement, open borders, and the Chinese Exclusion Cases

  Open Access•George W Rainbolt•Ethics & Global Politics•2026

  Añadir item

• Members Only? Why Associational Autonomy Cannot Justify Closing State Borders

  David V Axelsen•The Journal of Politics•2024

  Añadir item