Assessing the landscape of representational concepts
Commentary on Favela and Machery
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21501901 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rosa Cao (0000-0002-1726-477X, Department of Philosophy Stanford University Stanford California USA, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 40 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 226-232 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-04-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Mind & Language (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0268-1064 • E-ISSN: 1468-0017 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/mila.12535 |
| OpenAlex | W4408319786 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 12 |
On the basis of a series of surveys targeting neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers, Favela and Machery raise concerns about the conceptual messiness around what counts as a representation . I propose some alternative explanations for the pattern of responses elicited by the surveys, arguing that the way “representation” is used in the wild may turn out to be more disciplined than it initially appears—and then offer a brief catalog of these uses, as a step towards a fuller picture of what work (if any) the concept of representation is doing in different contexts
Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Epistemology · Sociology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Action Observation and Synchronization · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citas por año | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Altamente citado | No |